I personally don't like this that much because we shouldn't force this to users of XWiki and in any case it wouldn't make any sense to say that a specific XWiki instance is following the XWiki developer's WCAG rules (since the content or customilzations or even extensions installed, may not follow it).
Also, the XWiki footer is customizable and thus there shouldn't be any issue for any XWiki instance to put their own WCAG statement if they need/want it.
So -1 from me, at least in the way it's phrased. Also, this should have been proposed on the forum before being a jira issue IMO.
Vincent Massol on 02/Jan/25 11:23
Thx Lucas.
I personally don't like this that much because we shouldn't force this to users of XWiki and in any case it wouldn't make any sense to say that a specific XWiki instance is following the XWiki developer's WCAG rules (since the content or customilzations or even extensions installed, may not follow it).
Also, the XWiki footer is customizable and thus there shouldn't be any issue for any XWiki instance to put their own WCAG statement if they need/want it.
So -1 from me, at least in the way it's phrased. Also, this should have been proposed on the forum before being a jira issue IMO. EDIT: See https://forum.xwiki.org/t/accessibility-statement-visibility/16191
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v9.3.0#930000-sha1:287aeb6)
If image attachments aren't displayed, see this article.
