21 Jun
2010
21 Jun
'10
1:36 p.m.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 13:24, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
There are not, probably because we have never look at it and their defaults
differ.
Yes, and if this is not part of codestyle-eclipse, provide what is required
to have both IDE in sync.
Denis
Hi Denis,
On 06/21/2010 01:55 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote:
Sorry, I do not have Eclipse, maybe Thomas could precise this point.
What I am saying is that we do not have any written code style for that, and
we use the default of the IDE.
Hi Devs,
Currently we do not have any code style specification for imports. To
improve clarity of our commits, I propose that we decide once for all how
we
would like to have imports. Of course,
normalisation of existing code
will
come with normal commit, I do not intend to
update it only for that.
Are you saying that
http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/platform/xwiki-tools/trunk/xwiki-verific…
doesn't include information about import styles?
Currently,
Eclipse does java.*, org.*, com.* separated by blank lines
IntelliJ IDEA does com.*,org.* together, than a blank line and java.*
So you're saying that codestyle-eclipse.xml and codestyle-idea.xml are
not consistent?
Old existing code has there own ordering...
I propose the following style:
import java.*
import org.*
import com.*
import<anything else>
import org.xwiki.*
import com.xpn.*
import static<any>
If we agree on this, necessary IDE setup for both Eclipse and IntelliJ
should be prepare/updated. I will take IntelliJ in charge, a volunteer
for
Eclipse is welcome (Thomas?)
You mean update codestyle-eclipse.xml and codestyle-idea.xml ?
Thanks,
Marius
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
WDYT ?
Denis
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs