29 Apr
2008
29 Apr
'08
8:48 p.m.
Ohhhh, sorry, Id didn't see your post. I posted this in another Oracle
issue:
That's why I *very dislike Oracle* and I can't understand why people using
it, they just don't stick with the standard.
I'm not sure what it is in your case, but maybe it's because:
- VARCHAR is limited and Oracle invented VARCHAR2
- CHAR and VARCHAR don't accept empty values if NOT NULL constraint is set
(in that case the attribut has to be defined as NULL and has to be checked
with the Oracle special function NVL() )
- Names of object is limited to 30 chars
Other nice things invented by Oracle:
- no BOOLEAN
- no info tables
- no limit => you have to write a procedure!
- division of an integer 99'999'999 typ NUMERIC(10) with an integer 1'000
equals a rounded result 100'000 (!)
- and more...Oracle is a typical lock-in application...but managers love
it anyway.. ;-)
Cheers,
Squirrel
You will find the possible solution hidden in brackets...damn Oracle ;-)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Jeff Gerbracht <jag73(a)cornell.edu> wrote:
I've changed this locally to doc.language is not
null and it works fine,
however, I hesitate to treat this as a solution..
There were also three instances of
nameFilter = "name not like '%.%' and name <>
''";
in XWikiStatsServiceImpl.java.
Cheers,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs