Re: [xwiki-devs] [VOTE] (Results) Apply code style to imports

Well, Based on your feedback, the easiest and probably best solution is to keep the default for Eclipse (so, no need for a special config file) and to configure IntelliJ code style (it is the same file for all) to do the

as Eclipse, which will avoid confusion: import java.* import javax.* import org.* import com.* This choice already have a +1 from Marius, a +1 from Sergiu and here is

+1. I do not think we need long discussion on this, just an agreement, please could you cast your vote on this. Denis On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 16:13, Sergiu Dumitriu &lt;sergiu(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: > On 06/21/2010 04:04 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: >> On 06/21/2010 02:36 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 13:24, Marius Dumitru Florea< >>> mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Denis, >>>> >>>> On 06/21/2010 01:55 PM, Denis Gervalle wrote: >>>>> Hi Devs, >>>>> >>>>> Currently we do not have any code style specification for imports.

>>>>> improve clarity of our commits, I propose that we decide once for

> how >>>> we >>>>> would like to have imports. Of course, normalisation of existing

>>>> will >>>>> come with normal commit, I do not intend to update it only for that. >>>> >>>> Are you saying that >>>> >>>> >

>>>> doesn't include information about import styles? >>>> >>> >>> Sorry, I do not have Eclipse, maybe Thomas could precise this point. >>> What I am saying is that we do not have any written code style for

> and >>> we use the default of the IDE. >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Currently, >>>>> >>>>> Eclipse does java.*, org.*, com.* separated by blank lines >>>>> IntelliJ IDEA does com.*,org.* together, than a blank line and

>>>> >>>> So you're saying that codestyle-eclipse.xml and codestyle-idea.xml

>>>> not consistent? >>>> >>> >>> There are not, probably because we have never look at it and their > defaults >>> differ. >> >> I see. It's clear now. >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Old existing code has there own ordering... >>>>> >>>>> I propose the following style: >>>>> >>>>> import java.* >>>>> >>>>> import org.* >>>>> import com.* >>>>> import<anything else> >>>>> >> >>>>> import org.xwiki.* >>>>> import com.xpn.* >> >> I don't think separating this imports from org.* and com.* makes them >> much more visible. Also, for classes that don't depend on the old core >> (com.xpn.*) moving org.xwiki.* out of org.* breaks the order. Since >> we'll eventually drop the com.xpn.* package in favor of org.xwiki.* I >> think we should keep XWiki's imports under org.* and com.* . >> >> I'm +1 for enforcing a style for imports. I'm -0 for separating >> org.xwiki.* and com.xpn.* from org.* and com.* respectively. >> > > Same as Marius. > >> >>>>> >>>>> import static<any> >>>>> >>>>> If we agree on this, necessary IDE setup for both Eclipse and

>>>>> should be prepare/updated. I will take IntelliJ in charge, a

>>>> for >>>>> Eclipse is welcome (Thomas?) >>>> >>>> You mean update codestyle-eclipse.xml and codestyle-idea.xml ? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, and if this is not part of codestyle-eclipse, provide what is > required >>> to have both IDE in sync. >>> >>> Denis >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Marius >>>> >>>>> >>>>> WDYT ? >>>>> >>>>> Denis