We can use both . if can it is better for us

Regards
-Phung Nam

On 3/13/07, Sergiu Dumitriu < sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com> wrote:


On 3/13/07, Pablo Oliveira <pablo.oliveira@enst.fr > wrote:
On Mar 13, Vincent Massol wrote :
> We'll have to take a decision here in the future:
> 1) either we provide a configuration per component
> 2) or we provide a global configuration
>
> I prefer 1) because:
> - a component is encapsulated completely in a JAR
> - a component shouldn't  see by default configuration from other
> components. It's these other components who should offer APIs to
> return configuration data if required

I also like 1 better.

Yet I think from a user point of view, it seems more natural to edit a
single xwiki.cfg file than to edit a conf file inside some component's
JAR meta data. So I would still allow some global way of overriding
components configuration from a single configuration source.

Pablo


I also think that we need both.

--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu

--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev@objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto: xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto: sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws