29 Jul
2014
29 Jul
'14
1:25 p.m.
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
29 Jul
29 Jul
1:26 p.m.
FTR it’s
at https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/master/xwiki-platform-core/xwi…
Thanks
-Vincent
On 29 Jul 2014 at 14:26:14, vincent(a)massol.net
(vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
1:30 p.m.
I'm not best to judge but my gut feeling is our TinyMCE
implementation is not being used so +1 in principle.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 07/29/2014 02:26 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
FTR it’s at
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/tree/master/xwiki-platform-core/xwi…
Thanks
-Vincent
On 29 Jul 2014 at 14:26:14, vincent(a)massol.net
(vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:49 p.m.
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Jul 29, 2014 2:26 PM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's
WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
5:52 p.m.
+1
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
On Jul 29, 2014 2:26 PM, "vincent(a)massol.net" <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's
WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
6:34 p.m.
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
30 Jul
30 Jul
11:32 p.m.
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
- xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to your instance if
you need it.
What do others think?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
31 Jul
31 Jul
9:25 a.m.
My personal opinion is that it's OK to save a bit of time and remove the
code entirely, the retro-compat documentation would in this case be
"if you use syntax/1.0, you now need to edit it using the wikitext editor".
It's not as if their data will nolonger be accessible.
Thanks,
Caleb
On 07/30/2014 11:32 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
- xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to your instance if
you need it.
What do others think?
Thanks
-Vincent
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
2:07 p.m.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui - xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an
application manager descriptor.
I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to your instance if
you need it.
What do others think?
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It
was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that
we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if
someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis.
I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
9:03 p.m.
On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax:
<xwikidoc>
<web>ExtensionCode</web>
<name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name>
<language/>
<defaultLanguage/>
<translation>0</translation>
<parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent>
<creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator>
<author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author>
<customClass/>
<contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor>
<creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate>
<date>1322142794000</date>
<contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate>
<version>1.1</version>
<title/>
<template/>
<defaultTemplate/>
<validationScript/>
<comment/>
<minorEdit>false</minorEdit>
<syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId>
Thanks
-Vincent
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui - xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an
application manager descriptor. > I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add
explanations on how to add it to your instance if you need it.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
>> > Hi devs,
>> >
>> > Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307
:
>> >
>> > “
>> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in
XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from
our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install
them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
>> > “
>> >
>> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
1 Aug
1 Aug
9:34 a.m.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:03 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
Yes and again this documet is just an application descriptor, it's not
really part of XWiki Repository.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM,
vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax:
<xwikidoc>
<web>ExtensionCode</web>
<name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name>
<language/>
<defaultLanguage/>
<translation>0</translation>
<parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent>
<creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator>
<author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author>
<customClass/>
<contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor>
<creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate>
<date>1322142794000</date>
<contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate>
<version>1.1</version>
<title/>
<template/>
<defaultTemplate/>
<validationScript/>
<comment/>
<minorEdit>false</minorEdit>
<syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId>
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu@xwiki.org(mailto:sergiu@xwiki.org))
wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content
created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from
1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents
as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some
in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui - xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an
application manager descriptor. Thanks
-Vincent
--
Thomas Mortagne
> I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add
explanations on how to add it to your instance if you need it.
>
> What do others think?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
>> > Hi devs,
>> >
>> > Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307
:
>> >
>> > “
>> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in
XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from
our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install
them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks.
>> > “
>> >
>> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
13 Aug
13 Aug
10:16 a.m.
+1 to remove as long as the 1.0 documents are still editable in an
alternative editor (wiki editor or wysiwyg).
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:03 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax:
<xwikidoc>
<web>ExtensionCode</web>
<name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name>
<language/>
<defaultLanguage/>
<translation>0</translation>
<parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent>
<creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator>
<author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author>
<customClass/>
<contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor>
<creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate>
<date>1322142794000</date>
<contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate>
<version>1.1</version>
<title/>
<template/>
<defaultTemplate/>
<validationScript/>
<comment/>
<minorEdit>false</minorEdit>
<syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId>
Yes and again this documet is just an application descriptor, it's not
really part of XWiki Repository.
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne (thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu (sergiu(a)xwiki.org(mailto:
sergiu(a)xwiki.org)) wrote:
> >
> >> +1 from me.
> >>
> >> It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the
> >> xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields
> >> displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of
content
> >> created by old applications, and a
lot of long-lived wikis migrated
from
> >> 1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to
keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for
> >> those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the
documents
> >> as well?
> >
> > Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
> >
> > BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE
we
still have some in platform:
- xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
- xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an
application manager descriptor. Thanks
-Vincent
> > I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it
to
your instance if you need it.
> >
> > What do others think?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> >> On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
> >> > Hi devs,
> >> >
> >> > Here’s what I commented on
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
> >> >
> >> > “
> >> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in
XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since
it's
been like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
list, thanks.
>>
> “
>> >
>> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
8 Dec
8 Dec
10:47 a.m.
It's been more than 1 year since we started this thread and we still have
the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR. I just created a branch to
remove it
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/remove-tinymce-editor .
Note that besides the files located in resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
there are many other files (Velocity templates, JavaScript code, CSS styles
in the skin, Java test page objects) that reference the TinyMCE editor and
which had to be updated (see the branch). This makes the creation of a
"TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually, pretty
hard. I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its references
(see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0 documents, there will be an automatic
redirect to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide a
WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0 syntax any more.
WDYT?
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“
Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's
WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
list, thanks.
“
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
10:50 a.m.
On 8 Dec 2015 at 10:47:49, Marius Dumitru Florea
(mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com)) wrote:
It's been more than 1 year since we started this
thread and we still have
the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR. I just created a branch to
remove it
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/remove-tinymce-editor .
Note that besides the files located in resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
there are many other files (Velocity templates, JavaScript code, CSS styles
in the skin, Java test page objects) that reference the TinyMCE editor and
which had to be updated (see the branch). This makes the creation of a
"TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually, pretty
hard. I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its references
(see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0 documents, there will be an automatic
redirect to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide a
WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0 syntax any more.
WDYT?
I think we should wait 1 more month and do this cleanup in 8.0.
+1 to say we don’t provide a XWiki 1.0 WYSIWYG editor any more for 8.0.
-1 for doing this in 7.4 (seems too risky for little user benefit).
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Here’s what I commented on
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
>
> “
> Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's
> WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
> like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
> dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
> be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
> list, thanks.
> “
>
> WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
10:58 a.m.
+1 and yes 8.0 branch is not very far so we should probably wait
Great that you finally worked on this :)
Note that in the same subject old rendering engine is planned from
deprecation and contrib move in 8.0 too.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:50 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 8 Dec 2015 at 10:47:49, Marius Dumitru Florea
(mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com)) wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
It's been more than 1 year since we started
this thread and we still have
the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR. I just created a branch to
remove it
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/remove-tinymce-editor .
Note that besides the files located in resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
there are many other files (Velocity templates, JavaScript code, CSS styles
in the skin, Java test page objects) that reference the TinyMCE editor and
which had to be updated (see the branch). This makes the creation of a
"TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually, pretty
hard. I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its references
(see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0 documents, there will be an automatic
redirect to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide a
WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0 syntax any more.
WDYT?
I think we should wait 1 more month and do this cleanup in 8.0.
+1 to say we don’t provide a XWiki 1.0 WYSIWYG editor any more for 8.0.
-1 for doing this in 7.4 (seems too risky for little user benefit).
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> Here’s what I commented on
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
>
> “
> Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's
> WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been
> like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about
> dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still
> be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs
> list, thanks.
> “
>
> WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
11:42 a.m.
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
+1 and yes 8.0 branch is not very far so we should
probably wait
Great that you finally worked on this :)
Note that in the same subject old rendering engine is planned from
deprecation and contrib move in 8.0 too.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:50 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
XWiki's
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On 8 Dec 2015 at 10:47:49, Marius Dumitru Florea (
mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com))
wrote:
> It's been more than 1 year since we started this thread and we still
have
> the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR.
I just created a branch to
> remove it
> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/remove-tinymce-editor .
> Note that besides the files located in
resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
> there are many other files (Velocity
templates, JavaScript code, CSS
styles
> in the skin, Java test page objects) that
reference the TinyMCE editor
and
> which had to be updated (see the branch).
This makes the creation of a
> "TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually, pretty
> hard. I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its
references
> (see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0
documents, there will be an
automatic
redirect
to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide a
WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0 syntax any more.
WDYT?
I think we should wait 1 more month and do this cleanup in 8.0.
+1 to say we don’t provide a XWiki 1.0 WYSIWYG editor any more for 8.0.
-1 for doing this in 7.4 (seems too risky for little user benefit).
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Here’s what I commented on
> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
> >
> > “
> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in > > WAR. It was probably left for backward
compatibility but since it's
been
> > like 6-7 years that we've dropped
it, I believe we could vote about
> > dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll
still
> > be able to manually install them in
their wikis. I'll follow up on
the devs
>
list, thanks.
> “
>
> WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
11:49 a.m.
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
pretty
XWiki's
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 and yes 8.0 branch is not very far so we
should probably wait
Great that you finally worked on this :)
Note that in the same subject old rendering engine is planned from
deprecation and contrib move in 8.0 too.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:50 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
to
.
On 8 Dec 2015 at 10:47:49, Marius Dumitru Florea (
mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com))
wrote:
> It's been more than 1 year since we started this thread and we still
have
>> the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR. I just created a branch > Note
that besides the files located in
resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
> there are many other files (Velocity
templates, JavaScript code, CSS
styles
> in the skin, Java test page objects) that
reference the TinyMCE editor
and
>> which had to be updated (see the branch). This makes the creation of a
>> "TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually,
> hard.
I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its
references
> (see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0
documents, there will be an
automatic
redirect
to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide a
WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0 syntax any more.
WDYT?
I think we should wait 1 more month and do this cleanup in 8.0.
+1 to say we don’t provide a XWiki 1.0 WYSIWYG editor any more for 8.0.
-1 for doing this in 7.4 (seems too risky for little user benefit).
Thanks
-Vincent
> Thanks,
> Marius
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Here’s what I commented on
> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
> >
> > “
> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in > > WAR. It was probably left for backward
compatibility but since it's
been
> > like 6-7 years that we've dropped
it, I believe we could vote about
> > dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll
still
> > be able to manually install them in
their wikis. I'll follow up on
the devs
>
list, thanks.
> “
>
> WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs 
14 Dec
14 Dec
1:12 p.m.
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Guillaume
2015-12-08 11:49 GMT+01:00 Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>om>:
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/compare/remove-tinymce-editor
a
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
+1 for 8.x
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Mortagne <
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
> +1 and yes 8.0 branch is not very far so we should probably wait
>
> Great that you finally worked on this :)
>
> Note that in the same subject old rendering engine is planned from
> deprecation and contrib move in 8.0 too.
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:50 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <
vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
to
> >> remove it
> >>
On 8 Dec 2015 at 10:47:49, Marius Dumitru Florea (
mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com))
wrote:
> It's been more than 1 year since we started this thread and we still
have
>> the TinyMCE editor bundled in the XWiki WAR. I just created a branch .
> >> Note that besides the files located in
> resources/js/xwiki/wysiwyg/tinymce/*
> >> there are many other files (Velocity templates, JavaScript code, CSS
> styles
> >> in the skin, Java test page objects) that reference the TinyMCE
editor
> and
> >> which had to be updated (see the branch). This makes the creation
of
a
>>
"TinyMCE Editor" extension that can be installed, even manually,
pretty
> >> hard. I'm in favour of simply removing the TinyMCE files and its
> references
> >> (see the branch). For the XWiki 1.0 documents, there will be an
> automatic
> >> redirect to the Wiki editor. So we simply say that we don't provide
> >> WYSIWYG editor for the XWiki 1.0
syntax any more.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >
> > I think we should wait 1 more month and do this cleanup in 8.0.
> >
> > +1 to say we don’t provide a XWiki 1.0 WYSIWYG editor any more for
8.0.
> >
> > -1 for doing this in 7.4 (seems too risky for little user benefit).
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Marius
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi devs,
> >> >
> >> > Here’s what I commented on
> >> > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
> >> >
> >> > “
> >> > Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in
> XWiki's
> >> > WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since
it's
> been
> >> > like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote
about
> >> > dropping it from our sources
and if someone really needs it
they'll
still
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > be able to manually install them in
their wikis. I'll follow up on
the devs
> > list, thanks.
> > “
> >
> > WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
3295
days inactive
3798
days old
17 comments
9 participants
participants (9)
-
Caleb James DeLisle -
Denis Gervalle -
Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) -
Eduard Moraru -
Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
vincent＠massol.net