On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote: Currently we don't have any DocumentAccessBridge user which need to access the content for document default language, and as I said I don't see the need right know. So I just proposed to change getDocumentContent for a more local behavior (it's only my opinion, that's why I'm sending this mail) and we can add a specific method to access the default language content when needed. Since it's a bridge I just prefer to be sure we need it, maybe we will have the new model before anyone need to get the default language content using DocumentAccessBridge. For the same reason we should not create a new language identifier just for bridge if we don't really need it. Now if we really need something now, i would prefer something like: getDocumentContent(String) --> current getDocumentContent(String, String) --> specified getDocumentContentForDefaultLanguage(String) --> default With some clear comments saying that unless the user of the api really knows what he is doing he should not use getDocumentContentForDefaultLanguage(String). -- Thomas Mortagne