Ludovic:
Very good, thank you.  I will file the bug[s].  I was a little reluctant to do this,
because I wasn't sure it really was a bug, but I think I understand now that even if
it wasn't, bug reports that turn out to be mistaken aren't as bad as those that
don't get filed.  At minimum, they are formally tracked and answered, whereas the
mailing list is not, though by your high level of participation you and Jérémi may have
set unrealistic expectations.
I do not want to suggest that you stop being helpful in the mailing list for that
reason(please!) but perhaps an effort to clarify this might forestall some of the
frustrated complaints that we see here.  For example, it would help me - and probably
others - more confidently to offer this advice to anyone so that you wouldn't have to,
if you were merely to confirm my above-stated understanding of the situation.
And for completeness regarding this particular problem, I will note that in 0.9.840,
XWiki.ProtectUserPage(), which is called from com.xpn.xwiki.XWiki.createUser(), still
creates a "levelsye" field at line 1827 of XWiki.java in package com.xpn.xwiki,
so to be fully rid of this problem you must either change this line from
        newrightsobject.setStringValue("levelsye", userRights);
to
        newrightsobject.setStringValue("levels", userRights);
and recompile/redeploy, or re-run your offered database script after adding a new user.
This code appears to be the ultimate source of the problem, and will appear in my JIRA
filing.
Again, thank you for continued conscientious support of a well-crafted product.
brain[sic]
  -----Original Message-----
 From: Ludovic Dubost [mailto:ludovic@xwiki.com]
 Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 4:11 AM
 To: xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org
 Subject: Re: [xwiki-users] "Clone" another documents objects
 when creating a new document
 I slightly remember this problem. I think it is fixed in the recent
 version of XWiki OR it does not happen if you database was
 created from
 a recent one.
 Have you tried cleaning up the database from any field called
 "levelsye". Deleting in xwikiproperties and xwikiclassesprop
 should do it.
 What we can do is give an  SQL script to clean-up the
 database of this
 problem and move to 0.9.3 db which the problem fixed.
 You should indeed file the bug.
 We should also make sure recent version of XWiki clean up
 this problem
 using updateSchema
 Ludovic
 THOMAS, BRIAN M (SBCSI) a écrit :
  Jeremie (and Ludovic):
 I don't know whether this has been fixed yet, but in 0.9.840 if you
 copy a user's profile page (the one created by  
 XWiki.createUser()) the
  object copy fails silently (transaction aborted).
If your
 code examines the copied document immediately from the same  
 session,
  without clearing the cache, it looks right, but
after calling
 $xwiki.flushCache(), or viewing the document from any other  
 session,
  only an empty template shows, with no
XWiki.XWikiUsers object to
 display and no XWiki.XWikiRights objects.
 The object copy fails because one of them - the XWikiRights  
 object for
  XWiki.XWikiAdminGroup, which was created by
XWiki.ProtectUserPage()
 when the user was created - contains a field "levelsye"  
 which is not
  in the current schema for objects of class
XWiki.XWikiRights, which
 names the field "levels" instead.  And it also doesn't  
 matter if
the
  user was created by your wiki instance after
installation or if it
 came built-in with the database installation; the default users are
 also corrupted this way.
 I must apologize:  I probably should have filed a bug on this, but I
 didn't.  It wasn't initially clear to me what the status of it was,
 and since the job I was trying to do was my major priority,  
 I didn't
  take the time to find out.  But I think it's
two bugs -  
 actually three
  from the standpoint of the delivered product -
because the database
 load contains the result of one of the errors in the code:
  - first, the root cause:  XWiki.ProtectUserPage creates an
 XWiki.XWikiRights object with a "groups" field with value
 "XWiki.XWikiAdmin", a field named "levelsye" with the value  
from its
  userRights parameter, and "allow" value
of 1.  This object  
 cannot be
  copied to another page, because the
"levelsye" field is not in the
 current schema for XWiki.XWikiRights.
  - second:  the 0.9.2 database upload contains the result of this
 problem in all of its built-in user profile documents.  I  
 had thought
  that this was the source of the problem, and that
all new  
 users simply
  had the defective rights object copied from one
of those, until I
 discovered the above problem.
  - finally, the resulting problem that I had when changing XWiki's
 authentication scheme, which required existing users to be  
 renamed:
  When the attempt (within XWiki.copyDocument()) to
add the  
 new object
  to the new document fails because of the above,
no error  
 indication is
  given, and the document copy transaction
doesn't abort,  
 roll back or
  return a failure status. Moreover, the cache (at
least for  
 the current
  session) now holds a copy of the new document,
composed as  
 expected,
  so any attempt by the calling page to verify the
copy without first
 flushing the cache seems to succeed.
 I think I asked whether my characterization of this problem was
 correct, but didn't get a response.  Probably I should simply have
 filed it as a bug and let the developers correct me if I  
 was wrong.
  To avoid a problem of this sort in the future, I
think that perhaps
 the best protocol would be that I file it unless someone  
 objects; that
  would make sure that it was accounted for.
 brain[sic]
     -----Original Message-----
     *From:* BOUSQUET Jeremie [mailto:Jeremie.BOUSQUET@gemalto.com]
     *Sent:* Friday, September 01, 2006 3:45 AM
     *To:* xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org
     *Subject:* RE: [xwiki-users] "Clone" another documents objects
     when creating a new document
     Hello,
     I believe you can use the copyDocument() method. I use it to
     rename pages, I copy a document to a newly named document, then
     delete the old one.
     All objects and attachments are also copied in the process, so
     that may interest you (as far as all objects are included in the
     template document I believe)
     $xwiki.copyDocument($sourceDoc, $targetDoc)
     *Jeremie, Bousquet
     GSE Solution CMO
     Gemalto
     *Tel: +33 4 42 36 42 93
     Avenue du Jujubier, Z.I Athelia IV
     13705 La Ciotat, FRANCE
     *Jeremie.Bousquet(a)gemalto.com*
     
www.gemalto.com <http://www.gemalto.com/>
          
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 ----------
          *From:* Esbach, Brandon
[mailto:Esbachb@tycoelectronics.com]
         *Sent:* vendredi 25 août 2006 12:58
         *To:* xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org
         *Subject:* [xwiki-users] "Clone" another documents objects
         when creating a new document
         Hi All,
         Is there any way to clone all objects in an  
 existing document
          to a different document with one server
request?
         So that a template document can be maintained with default
         object values; and can be brought in painlessly to a new
 document.
         /Brandon Esbach/
         /Software Engineer/
         /M/A-Com Eurotec Operations/
         /LoughMahon Technology Park,/
         /Skehard Road,/
         /Blackrock,/
         /Cork, Ireland/
         /Tel  +353 21 4808305/
  
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  --
 --
 You receive this message as a subscriber of the
 xwiki-users(a)objectweb.org mailing list. To unsubscribe:
 mailto:xwiki-users-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
 For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
 ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:  
 http://www.objectweb.org/wws
     
 --
 Ludovic Dubost
 XPertNet: 
http://www.xpertnet.fr/
 Blog: 
http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
 XWiki: 
http://www.xwiki.com
 Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic