24 Mar
2007
24 Mar
'07
10:55 p.m.
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki and it
looks like all of them are different (contain different set of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and ApplicationResources_en.properties
are in english and are mostly identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en
file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
2. Are all messages from .properties used in XWiki, or some are redundant?
If the latter, are there plans for removal of unnecessary keys for 1.0release?
--
Best regards,
Pavel
25 Mar
25 Mar
10:15 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] Message resources
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki
and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set
of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and
ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly
identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties
1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
AppliationResources.properties. This allows any language to work even
if there are missing keys.
2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as
it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO
we should remove it
2. Are all messages from .properties used in XWiki, or
some are
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used.
If the latter, are there plans for removal of
unnecessary keys for
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer
used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message
to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not
using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation
for XWiki.
Thanks
-Vincent
11:54 p.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] Message resources
On 3/25/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
Indeed, with a minor observation that a few entries in AR_en.properties
override the ones in AR.properties.
1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki
and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set
of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and
ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly
identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties AppliationResources.properties. This allows any
language to work even
if there are missing keys.
2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as
it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO
we should remove it
In theory, if somebody decides to deploy a wiki mainly used in russian, for
example, he could replace AR.properties with AR_ru.properties as the default
resource bundle. The, in order for the english translation to work,
AR_en.properties should exist.
However, maintaining two resource files is not needed, as if someone knows
how to replace AR.properties, he should know how to create the backup
AR_en.properties.
In an ideal world (to be read: a world without Microsoft and Windows)
AR.props should be a symlink to the actual language file.
So, +1 for removing AR_en.properties.
2. Are all messages from .properties used in XWiki, or
some are
Almost all messages are used, but in different skins. One thing we can do to
ease the work would be to copy the current resource files into the dodo skin
directory, and declare it as deprecated, so that we can move on with the new
skins.
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used. If the latter, are there plans for removal of
unnecessary keys for
Is there a JIRA issue for this? I remember seeing this, but I don't know if
it was in a mail only, or on JIRA, too.
Thanks
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer
used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message
to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not
using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation
for XWiki. -Vincent
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
26 Mar
26 Mar
12:48 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] Message resources
Vincent, Sergui,
So as I understand, the translation process for message resources should be
as follows:
1. Copy AR.properties, add language-specific suffix.
2. Translate messages into specific language.
3. Watch the result, adjust messages as necessary. This is a continuous
process.
4. If some obstacles found, like hardcoded message structure which does not
fit the language, then
a) Create JIRA issue
b) Preferably submit a patch
(5). Contribute translation back to XWiki to ensure at least minimal support
& synchronization with other bundles
Item 5 is just a guess as I have no idea about how XWiki deals with
contributions of that kind.
Speaking about removal of unused keys, I believe it can be done only by
experienced XWiki developer.
Doing that without a good knowledge of all possible resource usage patterns
inevitably leads to a broken areas in application. At least that's what I've
seen before.
On 3/26/07, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/25/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
--
Best regards,
Pavel
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
Indeed, with a minor observation that a few entries in AR_en.properties
override the ones in AR.properties.
1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki
and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set
of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and
ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly
identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties AppliationResources.properties . This allows any
language to work even
if there are missing keys.
2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as
it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO
we should remove it
In theory, if somebody decides to deploy a wiki mainly used in russian,
for example, he could replace AR.properties with AR_ru.properties as the
default resource bundle. The, in order for the english translation to work,
AR_en.properties should exist.
However, maintaining two resource files is not needed, as if someone
knows how to replace AR.properties, he should know how to create the
backup AR_en.properties.
In an ideal world (to be read: a world without Microsoft and Windows)
AR.props should be a symlink to the actual language file.
So, +1 for removing AR_en.properties.
2. Are all messages from .properties used in
XWiki, or some are
Almost all messages are used, but in different skins. One thing we can do
to ease the work would be to copy the current resource files into the dodo
skin directory, and declare it as deprecated, so that we can move on with
the new skins.
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used. If the latter, are there plans for removal of
unnecessary keys for
Is there a JIRA issue for this? I remember seeing this, but I don't know
if it was in a mail only, or on JIRA, too.
Thanks
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer
used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message
to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not
using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation
for XWiki. -Vincent
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-users(a)objectweb.orgmailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-users-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
9:28 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] Message resources
On Mar 26, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Pavel wrote:
Vincent, Sergui,
So as I understand, the translation process for message resources
should be as follows:
1. Copy AR.properties, add language-specific suffix.
No need to do any copy... By default if a message is not found in the
resource bundle for the country/language it looks for it in the
default resource bundle (AR.properties).
Recommendation: use a proper IDE like Eclipse or even better IDEA.
They have support for resource bundle and make it real easy to spot
inconsistencies.
2. Translate messages into specific language.
Yes
3. Watch the result, adjust messages as necessary.
This is a
continuous process.
Yes
4. If some obstacles found, like hardcoded message
structure which
does not fit the language, then
a) Create JIRA issue
b) Preferably submit a patch
Yes
(5). Contribute translation back to XWiki to ensure at
least
minimal support & synchronization with other bundles
Yes
Item 5 is just a guess as I have no idea about how XWiki deals with
contributions of that kind.
See the contributing guide on xwiki.org. They're welcome :)
Speaking about removal of unused keys, I believe it can be done
only by experienced XWiki developer.
Doing that without a good knowledge of all possible resource usage
patterns inevitably leads to a broken areas in application. At
least that's what I've seen before.
True, but it's not much easier for any xwiki developers as nobody
knows where messages are used from. It's a search and replace
strategy (at least that's what it would be for me). And then do
testing to verify nothing is broken.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 3/26/07, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/25/07, Vincent Massol < vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki
and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set
of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and
ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly
identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties
Indeed, with a minor observation that a few entries in
AR_en.properties override the ones in AR.properties.
1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
AppliationResources.properties . This allows any language to work even
if there are missing keys.
2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as
it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO
we should remove it
In theory, if somebody decides to deploy a wiki mainly used in
russian, for example, he could replace AR.properties with
AR_ru.properties as the default resource bundle. The, in order for
the english translation to work, AR_en.properties should exist.
However, maintaining two resource files is not needed, as if
someone knows how to replace AR.properties, he should know how to
create the backup AR_en.properties.
In an ideal world (to be read: a world without Microsoft and
Windows) AR.props should be a symlink to the actual language file.
So, +1 for removing AR_en.properties.
2. Are all messages from .properties used in
XWiki, or some are
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used.
Almost all messages are used, but in different skins. One thing we
can do to ease the work would be to copy the current resource files
into the dodo skin directory, and declare it as deprecated, so that
we can move on with the new skins.
If the latter, are there plans for removal of
unnecessary keys for
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer
used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message
to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not
using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation
for XWiki.
Is there a JIRA issue for this? I remember seeing this, but I don't
know if it was in a mail only, or on JIRA, too.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
users(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto: xwiki-users-unsubscribe(a)objectweb.org
For general help: mailto: sympa(a)objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/
wws
--
Best regards,
Pavel
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
users(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-users-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/
wws
9:24 a.m.
New subject: [xwiki-users] Message resources
On Mar 25, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
No idea...
Thanks
-Vincent
On 3/25/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Pavel wrote:
AFAIK there's no default resource bundle. Or rather there's one but
it's always named without the country and language suffixes. Unless
I'm mistaken of course :)
Greetings,
There is a number of ApplicationResources_xx.properties in XWiki
and it looks like all of them are different (contain different set
of keys).
Both ApplicationResources.properties and
ApplicationResources_en.properties are in english and are mostly
identical except for ~70 missing keys in _en file.
Given that, I have two questions:
1. What is the "most supported" message resources file?
ApplicationResources.properties
Indeed, with a minor observation that a few entries in
AR_en.properties override the ones in AR.properties.
1) When a key is missing it's looked for in
AppliationResources.properties . This allows any language to work even
if there are missing keys.
2) I don't know why we have a AppplicationResources_en.properties as
it's supposed to be the same as ApplicationResources.properties. IMO
we should remove it
In theory, if somebody decides to deploy a wiki mainly used in
russian, for example, he could replace AR.properties with
AR_ru.properties as the default resource bundle. The, in order for the english translation to work,
AR_en.properties
should exist.
However, maintaining two resource files is not needed, as if
someone knows how to replace AR.properties, he should know how to
create the backup AR_en.properties.
In an ideal world (to be read: a world without Microsoft and
Windows) AR.props should be a symlink to the actual language file.
So, +1 for removing AR_en.properties.
It makes sense to me that AR files should be in their own skins,
except for messages for templates.
2. Are all messages from .properties used in
XWiki, or some are
redundant?
It's possible that some messages are no longer used.
Almost all messages are used, but in different skins. One thing we
can do to ease the work would be to copy the current resource files
into the dodo skin directory, and declare it as deprecated, so that
we can move on with the new skins. If the latter,
are there plans for removal of unnecessary keys for
1.0 release?
Sure, if you want to help you can tell us which ones are no longer
used, submit a patch and we'll remove them.
Note that we also have some work to do in the future on the message
to use sentences instead of just words. This will allow languages not
using the same word ordering than enlglish to provide a translation
for XWiki.
Is there a JIRA issue for this? I remember seeing this, but I don't
know if it was in a mail only, or on JIRA, too.
6798
days inactive
6800
days old
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Pavel -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol