[xwiki-dev] [JIRA] Missing "fix for" fields...
Vincent Massol
vincent at massol.net
Mon Jan 22 15:12:14 CET 2007
On Nov 15, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>
> It's not sure that we will find exactly in which version they have
> been
> fixed.
> If we are working on the head, is the policy to mark it fix for the
> upcoming release ?
The policy is to fill the "fix for" either:
* When you're planning to fix an issue for a given release. If it
happens that it's not fixed for that release then the fix for must be
updated at the time of the release
* When you're closing an issue
In any case there should never be any issue closed without a "fix
for" filled.
> in this case what happens if the upcoming release
> never comes out or does not have the version number that we thought
I'm not sure what you mean. Imagine that we define a version named
1.1 planned for a given date. Now imagine that we decide not to
release this version and instead to name it 1.0.9. Then in JIRA we'll
rename 1.1 in 1.0.9 and all issues will then have a fix for for 1.0.9.
I'm probably not understanding something here :-)
Thanks
-Vincent
> Maybe we need to define our versioning policy
>
> Ludovic
>
> Vincent Massol a écrit :
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > I've noticed that there are 43 issues which are resolved or
> closed and which
> > do not have a "fix for" value. This means that these issues are
> not going to
> > be associated with a XWiki version which also means that they are
> > unaccounted for and that users cannot know in which version they
> have been
> > fixed.
> >
> > I think it would be good if everyone had a look and added a "fix
> for" value
> > for the issues they have fixed.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Note: With the default jira workflow it's not possible to edit an
> issue that
> > has been closed so you'll have to reopen it and close it again.
> If you want
> > I can also modify the workflow to allow editing an issue that's
> been closed.
> > Let me know.
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/attachments/20070122/64dce523/attachment.htm
More information about the devs
mailing list