[xwiki-users] "Inline" mode

Peter Flynn pflynn at adobe.com
Wed Dec 13 23:23:14 CET 2006


Aha, now I understand what was happening: we were using #includeForm() as a way of inserting snippets of boilerplate text (like the "non-neutrality" warnings seen on Wikipedia, etc.).  Since those snippets weren't really proper forms, the "Edit this Page" behavior looked screwed up-nothing was becoming editable, so it looked like just another static view of the page.

 

I've worked around this by writing a new #insert() macro that simply wraps #includeForm() so that XWiki doesn't see it being referenced in the page.  (It would also work to just switch to #includeTopic(), but I want macros in the snippets to be evaluated in the including page's context).

 

Thanks for the lead, Vincent!

 

- Peter

 

________________________________

From: Vincent Massol [mailto:vincent at massol.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:39 AM
To: xwiki-users at objectweb.org
Subject: RE: [xwiki-users] "Inline" mode

 

Hi Peter,

 

I wondered about this myself and documented it here: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/UserGuide/PageEdition#HFormeditionmode28akainlinemode29 in the user guide.

 

Thanks

-Vincent

 

 

From: Peter Flynn [mailto:pflynn at adobe.com] 
Sent: mardi 12 décembre 2006 23:09
To: xwiki-users at objectweb.org
Subject: [xwiki-users] "Inline" mode

 

Hi everyone,

 

I'm wondering about the "inline" view of pages -- i.e. when the URL contains "xwiki/bin/inline".  There are certain pages on my wiki where the "Edit this Page" link sporadically redirects to this view rather than the usual "xwiki/bin/edit" URL.  Does anyone know why this might be?

 

Thanks,

 

- Peter

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20061213/fdb45bf7/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the users mailing list