> So I think this issue needs some extra details in order to understand better its priority and type (whether it's a bug or not).
IMO it's definitely a bug because it's an unexpected inconsistency. XWiki Standard should look the same in different browsers, as much as possible, and this is definitely a noticeable difference. Whatever the solution we go with, the main point here is to remove the inconsistency.
Charpentier Lucas on 02/Oct/25 16:45
IMO a good solution would be to add flex-wraping to actions so that they fit their container width. Flex-wraping should be consistent and fit whatever amount of actions or conditions provided.
Assuming those items are flex wrapped, we can take care of aligning them correctly too, which is deffo an improvement that'd be nice for Chrome
Charpentier Lucas on 02/Oct/25 16:46
IMO a good solution would be to add flex-wraping to actions so that they fit their container width. Flex-wraping should be consistent and fit whatever amount of actions or conditions provided.
Assuming those items are flex wrapped, we can take care of aligning them correctly too, which is deffo an improvement that'd be nice for Chrome :)
PS: Flex-wraping might not work because of recursive layout size constraints, let's see...
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v9.3.0#930000-sha1:287aeb6)
If image attachments aren't displayed, see this article.
