26 May
2017
26 May
'17
12:27 p.m.
Hi,
What about "Standard XWiki Flavor"? I think it was mentioned in previous
discussions.
It`s basically what you get when you download. Once you start customizing
or installing some other Flavor, it`s no longer "standard".
That and the fact that we used to have, in older versions, a packaging (for
the xar or war module, don`t remember) that featured "standard" in it`s
name.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau
<
guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
going
the
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
+1 for Classic
Classic sounds good. +1
2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <oseres(a)xwiki.com>om>:
a
I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3
reasons :
For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
might
> have more than one
> There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
> It has a distinguishable name
>
> I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
> non-xwiki ones...)
>
> Olivier Sérès
>
> > Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
> écrit :
> >
> >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org>
> wrote:
> >>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
> >>> Hi devs,
> >>>
> >>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new
platform
> >>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
> >>>
> >>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when
installed
XWiki
now.
>>>
>>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not
tied
> >>> to any specific use case (so forget about "Knwonledge Base
Flavor"
> >>> :)).
> >>>
> >>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
> >>> * "XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
> >>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
> >>
> >> A few more ideas:
> >>
> >> * Classic
> >> * Raw
> >> * Starter
> >
> > Not a fan or "Raw".
> >
> > I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for
most users.
> > Not sure about "Starter".
> >
> >>
> >>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
> >>>
> >>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a
base flavor.
> >>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
> >>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
> >>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
> >>>
> >>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know,
it's not
>>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually
see
> >>> severals of those in the picker anyway and I find it nicer than
> >>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing
since
>>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm
also
>>
fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if others think it's a better name.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
--
Thomas Mortagne