Does it matter if the 'agent' is offline sometimes? What would be a good uptime / day for one such 'agent'? I'll put my desktop to work on it, but only as long as I don't need quiet in my room (it sounds like an airplane engine) - so that means it won't be working night shifts.
<br><br>Have a nice day!<br>Radu<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/3/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Vincent Massol</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:vincent@massol.net">vincent@massol.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi everyone,<br><br>Some of you may have seen that we&#39;re now using TeamCity (http://<br><a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/">www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/</a>) for XWiki&#39;s continuous build:<br><a href="http://teamcity.xwiki.org">
http://teamcity.xwiki.org</a><br><br>The nice thing is that TC allows to distribute the build work to<br>build agents.<br><br>XPertNet is currently providing one agent on the <a href="http://teamcity.xwiki.org">teamcity.xwiki.org
</a><br>machine.<br><br>However we&#39;ve found that the builds are stacking up and are a bit too<br>long to run.<br><br>Since TC supports parallel builds on different agents we&#39;d like to<br>call the community for help.
<br><br>If you have a machine that has some spare cycles for running XWiki<br>builds then we could hook it up to the <a href="http://teamcity.xwiki.org">teamcity.xwiki.org</a> server to<br>distribute the build load.<br><br>
We don&#39;t need that many agents. Probably 1 or 2 (in addition to the<br>one we have) would be enough for starters.<br><br>Thanks!<br>-Vincent, on behalf of the xwiki dev team<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>devs mailing list<br><a href="mailto:devs@xwiki.org">devs@xwiki.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs">http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br>