24 May
2017
24 May
'17
4:52 p.m.
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau <
guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1 for Classic
Classic sounds good. +1
2017-05-24 14:16 GMT+02:00 Olivier Seres <oseres(a)xwiki.com>om>:
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (guillaume.delhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
I m also in flavor of Classic Flavor for 3
reasons :
For the last 10 years, it was THE (only one) proposed flavor, now we
might
have more than one
There is "Class" in classic , sound positive to me
It has a distinguishable name
I find "xwiki flavour" confusing ( it implies that other flavors are
non-xwiki ones...)
Olivier Sérès
tied
Le 24 mai 2017 à 14:03, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> a
écrit :
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.org>
wrote:
>> On 05/24/2017 05:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'm getting closer to finish with the hard work around new platform
>> flavor which is going to replace XE.
>>
>> Need to decide what user will see in the Flavor picker when installed
XWiki now.
>>>
>>> As a reminder we decided that this would be a generic flavor, not >>> to any specific use case (so forget
about "Knwonledge Base Flavor"
>>> :)).
>>>
>>> Here is a few ideas gathered in previous mails:
>>> * "XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Default XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Generic XWiki Flavor"
>>> * "Base XWiki Flavor"
>>
>> A few more ideas:
>>
>> * Classic
>> * Raw
>> * Starter
>
> Not a fan or "Raw".
>
> I like "Classic", might sound better than "Default" for most
users.
> Not sure about "Starter".
>
>>
>>> "Generic" is probably a way too technical term.
>>>
>>> "Base" would be misleading IMO since it's not really a base
flavor.
>>> Its primary goal is not to be used as a dependency (of course it's
>>> fine to have it as dependency if you just want to add pre installed
>>> extensions to the default flavor). It's a -1 for me.
>>>
>>> Frankly I would simply go for "XWiki Flavor". I know, it's not
going
>>> to be the only flavor for XWiki but it's obvious when you actually
see
>>> severals of those in the picker
anyway and I find it nicer than
>>> "Default XWiki Flavor" which basically means the same thing since
the
>>> XWiki core project does not plan to provide any other flavor. I'm
also
> fine with "Default XWiki Favor" if
others think it's a better name.
>
> WDYT ?
>
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
--
Thomas Mortagne