Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r4670 - xwiki-products/curriki/branches
Hi David, On Aug 30, 2007, at 7:51 PM, David Ward wrote:
Author: dward Date: 2007-08-30 19:51:15 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007) New Revision: 4670
Added: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2/ Log: - Branch created for Curriki 1.2 release
Copied: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2 (from rev 4669, xwiki-products/curriki/trunk)
It seems the version numbers in the pom.xml files for curriki are wrong since that you're tagging some old revs with 1.2.x. Poms says 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Should that be fixed? Thanks -Vincent PS: I think we should have dedicated SVN/Mailing lists for curriki since it's not meant to follow the same practices than xwiki. Also every time curriki makes a commit, it increases the svn revs for xwiki and vice-versa. We need to think about that. Last trunks-devs/ users for xwiki/curriki should be separate IMO. WDY? _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Vincent, I am not sure exactly how the pom versions are supposed to relate to the application versions, but with the difficulty in doing builds against the 1.1 xwiki branch before I created this branch I am afraid to touch those and just left them as you originally created them (there was issues finding some 5-SNAPSHOT version of something even though it should have been there). The x.y.z versioning method was just introduced (with those tags and branch) as before this Curriki was not using any straight-forward versioning scheme (more of a description). Splitting the SVN and Mailing lists for curriki might be an idea if it bothers anyone. The increase in svn revs don't bother me as that's just how svn works (commits to branches, tags, etc. all increase the repo revision). Having a separate trunks-devs could be nice as well. Of course, right now I have to adjust things manually anyway on the checked out version (since we're using the xwiki 1.1 branch). Dave -- On 8/30/07, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi David,
On Aug 30, 2007, at 7:51 PM, David Ward wrote:
Author: dward Date: 2007-08-30 19:51:15 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007) New Revision: 4670
Added: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2/ Log: - Branch created for Curriki 1.2 release
Copied: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2 (from rev 4669, xwiki-products/curriki/trunk)
It seems the version numbers in the pom.xml files for curriki are wrong since that you're tagging some old revs with 1.2.x. Poms says 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
Should that be fixed?
Thanks -Vincent
PS: I think we should have dedicated SVN/Mailing lists for curriki since it's not meant to follow the same practices than xwiki. Also every time curriki makes a commit, it increases the svn revs for xwiki and vice-versa. We need to think about that. Last trunks-devs/ users for xwiki/curriki should be separate IMO. WDY?
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi David, On Sep 5, 2007, at 6:32 PM, David Ward wrote:
Vincent,
I am not sure exactly how the pom versions are supposed to relate to the application versions,
They're one and the same.
but with the difficulty in doing builds against the 1.1 xwiki branch before I created this branch I am afraid to touch those and just left them as you originally created them (there was issues finding some 5-SNAPSHOT version of something even though it should have been there). The x.y.z versioning method was just introduced (with those tags and branch) as before this Curriki was not using any straight-forward versioning scheme (more of a description).
Splitting the SVN and Mailing lists for curriki might be an idea if it bothers anyone.
I just don't see any reason to have them be the same since: * the communities are separate * the committers are separate * the development practices are separate
The increase in svn revs don't bother me as that's just how svn works (commits to branches, tags, etc. all increase the repo revision).
Yes you're right.
Having a separate trunks-devs could be nice as well. Of course, right now I have to adjust things manually anyway on the checked out version (since we're using the xwiki 1.1 branch).
I think Curriki is the perfect project for XWiki's Forge. What this would mean: * A dedicated SVN (or at least a separate root tree) * A dedicated JIRA project (shoud be the same as now) * Dedicated mailing lists * A dedicated wiki This also means that xwiki.org would be redesigned (we need to do that anyway since we now have XEM and Watch in addition to XE) to be an umbrella site for all the XWiki ecosystem projects: XWiki Platform, XE, XEM, Watch, Curriki, etc. So each project would get its own wiki: * enterprise.xwiki.org * manager.xwiki.org * watch.xwiki.org * curriki.xwiki.org Actually it's not just curriki but any project in the xwiki sphere that reaches a certain level of maturity and which outgrows the xwiki platform could also be elected to top level status in the forge (same as what is done in Apache land). What do others think? Thanks -Vincent
On 8/30/07, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi David,
On Aug 30, 2007, at 7:51 PM, David Ward wrote:
Author: dward Date: 2007-08-30 19:51:15 +0200 (Thu, 30 Aug 2007) New Revision: 4670
Added: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2/ Log: - Branch created for Curriki 1.2 release
Copied: xwiki-products/curriki/branches/curiki-1.2 (from rev 4669, xwiki-products/curriki/trunk)
It seems the version numbers in the pom.xml files for curriki are wrong since that you're tagging some old revs with 1.2.x. Poms says 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
Should that be fixed?
Thanks -Vincent
PS: I think we should have dedicated SVN/Mailing lists for curriki since it's not meant to follow the same practices than xwiki. Also every time curriki makes a commit, it increases the svn revs for xwiki and vice-versa. We need to think about that. Last trunks-devs/ users for xwiki/curriki should be separate IMO. WDY?
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
participants (2)
-
David Ward -
Vincent Massol