[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Add .xml extension to exported documents files names
Hi xwikiers, I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it. So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable). WDYT ? -- Thomas Mortagne
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
+1 to add the .xml extension to our exported wiki pages. -0 to make this extension configurable, those are xml files and the importer can deal with files with or without this extension, if you really want to add this option for some backward compatibility issues I'd prefer that it does not appear in our default cfg. -- Jean-Vincent Drean
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences)
+1 for adding the extension, -0 for the configuration
- rename the files in subversion server
Make sure you do proper SVN rename, and not external rename + svn del/add, in order to preserve the file history. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
+1 for adding extension 0 for making it configurable -- it could be quite odd to have the XML files saved with a .exe extension because of user configuration. If it's XML then it should stay .xml (at most .*ml). And it could be a little user confusing when exchanging .xars
WDYT ?
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration -- Artem Melentyev
Another question : 1.5 or only in 1.6 after JV create the branch ? I would prefer 1.6 since 1.5 is in RC phase but I'm not critically against 1.5 On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
+1 for 1.6M1. I prefer not to create the branch for the moment since Jerome isn't working on captchas and it's easier for everyone to keep trunk 1.5 until RC (planned for the beginning of next week), is it ok for everyone ? On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Another question : 1.5 or only in 1.6 after JV create the branch ?
I would prefer 1.6 since 1.5 is in RC phase but I'm not critically against 1.5
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Jean-Vincent Drean
+5 for adding xml extension. Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet. Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk. On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for 1.6M1.
I prefer not to create the branch for the moment since Jerome isn't working on captchas and it's easier for everyone to keep trunk 1.5 until RC (planned for the beginning of next week), is it ok for everyone ?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Another question : 1.5 or only in 1.6 after JV create the branch ?
I would prefer 1.6 since 1.5 is in RC phase but I'm not critically against 1.5
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Jean-Vincent Drean _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them 2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK) 3) do nothing +1 for 2)
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for 1.6M1.
I prefer not to create the branch for the moment since Jerome isn't working on captchas and it's easier for everyone to keep trunk 1.5 until RC (planned for the beginning of next week), is it ok for everyone ?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Another question : 1.5 or only in 1.6 after JV create the branch ?
I would prefer 1.6 since 1.5 is in RC phase but I'm not critically against 1.5
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Jean-Vincent Drean _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them 2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK) 3) do nothing
+1 for 2)
+1 for 2)
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for 1.6M1.
I prefer not to create the branch for the moment since Jerome isn't working on captchas and it's easier for everyone to keep trunk 1.5 until RC (planned for the beginning of next week), is it ok for everyone ?
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Another question : 1.5 or only in 1.6 after JV create the branch ?
I would prefer 1.6 since 1.5 is in RC phase but I'm not critically against 1.5
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi xwikiers,
I'm reopening the old thread at http://markmail.org/message/qnfqvdaxyt46hdll. Now that the problem related at http://markmail.org/message/5hola4gk5mvcggq3 is "fixed" I propose to revote for it.
So to summarize the goal is to provide an more clear extension to exported wiki pages. To be completed, this means : - modify the core packager plugin to add extension to pages (I think we should make it configurable in xwiki.cfg and maybe in XWikiPreferences) - rename the files in subversion server
Here is my +1 (and +1 for making the extension configurable).
WDYT ?
+1 for .xml 0 for configuration
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Jean-Vincent Drean _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them
-1 if it can be avoided.
2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK)
+1 (since the import of a xar containing pages with the xml extension has been tested on XE 1.4 and 1.5, right ?).
3) do nothing
Considering you last commit: -1, it'd mean that official xars would stay the same while user created xars (with 1.6) now contain pages with the xml extension. -- Jean-Vincent Drean
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them
-1 if it can be avoided.
2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK)
+1 (since the import of a xar containing pages with the xml extension has been tested on XE 1.4 and 1.5, right ?).
Yes, also tested in 1.3 and 1.2 the first time this has been discussed.
3) do nothing
Considering you last commit: -1, it'd mean that official xars would stay the same while user created xars (with 1.6) now contain pages with the xml extension.
-- Jean-Vincent Drean _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them 2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK) 3) do nothing
+1 for 2) -- Artem Melentyev
4 +1 for 2) so 2) it is On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Artem Melentyev <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
+5 for adding xml extension.
Making it configurable seems negative so no configuration yet.
Here come the big patches for XE and applications trunk.
In fact I need a vote for applications as theses are used in 1.5 : 1) create a branch for each of them 2) rename it and XE 1.5 will have some page containing .xml in its XAR package (this is not a problem core support importing pages with any names since before 1.0 AFAIK) 3) do nothing
+1 for 2)
-- Artem Melentyev _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
participants (5)
-
ancapaula.luca＠xwiki.com -
Artem Melentyev -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne