Hi, This is not only related to comments but also to tags (also objects) and maybe also attachments. The behavior you describe here for comments is taken by confluence and I personally find it more intuitive -- since it preserves the "forum metaphor" for the comments (on a forum you can't "revert" what other people say). However it's very hard to tell what would be best for the users (unless you do a case study in which you ask 100+ users). The only question about having it as an option (for each class I suppose if you want something generic) is how hard it is to implement and roll-in ? Catalin On 8/24/07, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

This is more a matter of opinions. Should a comment increase the version of a document? I'd say yes, but the view of simple users is that a comment should not affect the document, as it is something describing the document, not belonging to the document. So we should have a parameter that configures this.

WDYT? Sergiu -- http://purl.org/net/sergiu

-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws