[xwiki-devs] [Contrib] Request repository for integration between XWiki and Activiti
Hello, Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/) I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI. Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names: 1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH) WDYT ? Regards, Sorin B. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;) To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side. In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension. Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
Hello Clemens, This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention. Regards, Sorin B. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
After consulting with Vincent, I decided that Activiti Application is better suited for the JIRA project name. Thanks Sorin B. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application. On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu
I agree, application sounds more appropriate. I'll wait for its creation. Thanks. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact
I
have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki
and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
I have released the Activiti Application. Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned automatically to me Thanks, Sorin B. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate. I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
fact I
have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki and
Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/)
I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI.
Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi Sorin, On 20 Feb 2014 at 11:13:18, Sorin Burjan ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
I have released the Activiti Application. Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned automatically to me
You should check IRC. You already asked there and we (I) replied there :) sburjan: done, see http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XACTIVITII sburjan: you could create a first jira and close it with a fixversion of 1.0 Thanks -Vincent
Thanks, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate. I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in
fact I
have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan
wrote:
> Hello, > > Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( > http://activiti.org/) > > I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. > For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source > code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key > ACTIVITI. > > Thanks in advance, > Sorin B. >
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi Sorin, I've managed to install the Activiti integration. I modified the page on extensions and added a zip of the libraries to make it easier for people to install. I haven't tested because I need to create a process. It would be nice to include a process sample on the extension page to make it easier for people to check what can be done. Otherwise it looks quite cool. Ludovic 2014-02-20 11:12 GMT+01:00 Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>:
I have released the Activiti Application. Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned automatically to me
Thanks, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]
wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate. I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2 possible names:
1) Activiti Application 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash Integration for CRaSH)
WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really
does
that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
Regards, Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between
XWiki and
> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( > http://activiti.org/) > > I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. > For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source > code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key > ACTIVITI. > > Thanks in advance, > Sorin B. >
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
Hello Ludovic and everybody, I have added 5 sample processes and I have mention about them http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Activiti+Application#HS... For everybody who wants to try out he application and has questions or encounters issues, please ask on the mailing lists or create JIRA issues. I've put a lot of effort in creating the application and I'd love to see it used by the community. Regards, Sorin B. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Sorin,
I've managed to install the Activiti integration. I modified the page on extensions and added a zip of the libraries to make it easier for people to install. I haven't tested because I need to create a process. It would be nice to include a process sample on the extension page to make it easier for people to check what can be done.
Otherwise it looks quite cool.
Ludovic
2014-02-20 11:12 GMT+01:00 Sorin Burjan <[email protected]>:
I have released the Activiti Application. Can someone create the JIRA project for it please ? Also if you could specify that the reported issues NOT to be assigned automatically to me
Thanks, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Sorin Burjan <[email protected]
wrote:
I agree, application sounds more appropriate. I'll wait for its creation.
Thanks.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
Most of the applications are an integration with something: IRC is pircbot integration, presentation is Google HTML5 slides integration, scheduler is quartz integration, etc. As long as it provides something useful in the XWiki UI, it's an application.
On 01/10/2014 03:46 AM, Sorin Burjan wrote:
Hello Clemens,
This is a fully fledged integration, which has a pretty solid UI: Integration in the Administration section and also an UI Extension in the Applications Panel. So from this point of view, it can be seen as an application. The "integration" dilemma is that it's a bigger application than most of the ones we have on extensions. It integrates another sub-system in the wiki if you'd like to see it that way. So this is why I am not sure which is the best naming convention.
Regards, Sorin B.
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar < [email protected]> wrote:
> Actually I am not sure about the JIRA project name. I see 2
possible
names: > > 1) Activiti Application > 2) Activiti Integration (because I see that Vincent has chosen Crash > Integration for CRaSH) > > WDYT ?
I am not sure what the thing really does, so for me "it depends". ;)
To be called an application I expect it to be usable "out if the box" (after some configuration, maybe), so unless your extension really does that, for me "Activiti Integration" sounds better, as it has a somewhat lower expectation on the UI side.
In any case I am really interested to see what that thing does; in fact I have heard several users asking for something like that because they consider it a very useful extension.
Cheers, Clemens
> > Regards, > Sorin B. > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sorin Burjan < [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and >> Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( >> http://activiti.org/) >> >> I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. >> For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source >> code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key >> ACTIVITI. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Sorin B. >>
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Done for Github: https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-activiti Enjoy -Vincent On 9 Jan 2014 at 15:51:02, Sorin Burjan ([email protected]) wrote: Hello, Last year I worked for my master thesis on a integration between XWiki and Activiti. Activiti is a popular open-source workflow execution engine. ( http://activiti.org/) I'd like to commit my work so others can use and improve it. For this, I'd like a repository called application-activiti for the source code, and also a JIRA project called Activiti Application with the key ACTIVITI. Thanks in advance, Sorin B.
participants (6)
-
Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar -
Ludovic Dubost -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Sorin Burjan -
Sorin Burjan -
vincent＠massol.net