[xwiki-devs] Contrib project documentation update
Hi Devs, I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository Please review it and let me know if it's ok. I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space. There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ? Thanks -Vincent
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
No, we always remove from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ what we moved to github so everything you can find in there is actually still not moved which means most of what we used to have.
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
Hi, On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/ I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
No, we always remove from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ what we moved to github so everything you can find in there is actually still not moved which means most of what we used to have.
Actually, http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/projects/wiki30/ has been moved to GitHub but is still present on SVN. AFAIK, it can be safely removed from SVN since that version is now outdated. Thanks, Eduard
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this: <version>See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version> Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that as a comment: <!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for the latest available version --> <version>3.1</version> As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone applications.
I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it already).
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella.
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this: <version>See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version>
Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that as a comment:
<!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for the latest available version --> <version>3.1</version>
As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone applications.
I haven't touched any of those. They were there before. Please feel free to improve them.
I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
I've also just added some information about the SVN GitHub view: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository#HGettingSourc...
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it already).
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella.
Yes I agree. Can you add it?
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README? Thanks -Vincent
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/08/2011 11:27 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Devs,
I've updated http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/
I don't like this: <version>See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml</version>
Hasty people could just copy/paste it as it is. How about putting that as a comment:
<!-- See https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/blob/master/pom.xml for the latest available version --> <version>3.1</version>
As a minor remark, it's repeated quite often that "your project can be used as a dependency by other projects", so it could imply that contributions are generally modules/libraries, and not stand-alone applications.
I haven't touched any of those. They were there before. Please feel free to improve them.
I've also updated http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository
I've also just added some information about the SVN GitHub view: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/SourceRepository#HGettingSourc...
"XWiki is an ObjectWeb's project" is wrong, it should be OW2 (fixed it already).
Please review it and let me know if it's ok.
I've removed several notions that don't make sense anymore like sandbox, personal directory space.
Well, we could still say that github allows anyone to host its own projects, without the need to be accepted on xwiki-contrib, and that any repository can be later moved under the xwiki-contrib umbrella.
Yes I agree. Can you add it?
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
Would be nicer to separate active contributions from retired projects IMO.
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository. I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib. Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners. I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated? -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib. That makes the most sense to me since: * it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox * it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones * it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need their own repos Thanks -Vincent
On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since: * it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox * it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones * it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need their own repos
Done. All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin integration, waiting for him to move it out. After that, the only active thing left in the whole SVN repository would be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since: * it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox * it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones * it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need their own repos
Done.
All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin integration, waiting for him to move it out.
What about retired/? (see my mail on the other thread about a proposal for that).
After that, the only active thing left in the whole SVN repository would be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet.
We still need to remove from the SVN repo stuff we've moved out. Thanks -Vincent
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects. Right now I see only 2 options: 1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what they've been replaced with 2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired". Here's what I think it is: - projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it - projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF - http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried. WDYT? Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose 1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2). Thanks -Vincent
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options: 1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what they've been replaced with 2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired". Here's what I think it is: - projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it - projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF - http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose 1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
+1 for 2) and I agree that it would have been better to have sub organization or sub repository in github to have all the xwiki repositories in the same place.
Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
On 08/12/2011 05:46 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options: 1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what they've been replaced with 2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired". Here's what I think it is: - projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it - projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF - http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose 1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
For the moment I put them on xwiki-contrib, in a "retired" repository. For the future, I agree that an xwiki-attic organization would be better; still, I prefer to leave things as they are for the moment, until we find something else to put there (old XWiki Workspaces, old XWatch). -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:46 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
There's also the question of where to put retired projects.
Right now I see only 2 options: 1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning what they've been replaced with 2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there
Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired". Here's what I think it is: - projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it - projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in the ASF - http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis
If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of xwiki-retried.
WDYT?
Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd choose 1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in favor of 2).
For the moment I put them on xwiki-contrib, in a "retired" repository.
ok but how do you handle branches/tags in a single repository for all retired projects? Thanks -Vincent
For the future, I agree that an xwiki-attic organization would be better; still, I prefer to leave things as they are for the moment, until we find something else to put there (old XWiki Workspaces, old XWatch).
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the "retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later to their own project and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they don't have separated rights.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
Hi, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them
ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention
the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later to their own project
Not sure about it, but when moving them to their own repo (if needed), we have to copy/paste outside of git and the history is lost, right? Thanks, Eduard
and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they don't have separated rights.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On 08/12/2011 01:47 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote:
There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them
ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention
the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in one big repository, or each project separated?
Ok for one sandbox repository, we can always move some of them later to their own project
Not sure about it, but when moving them to their own repo (if needed), we have to copy/paste outside of git and the history is lost, right?
No, git allows to extract a sub-path out of a repository with all its history.
Thanks, Eduard
and yes as Vincent said they don't really need to be in separated repositories since we don't release them and they don't have separated rights.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
participants (4)
-
Eduard Moraru -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol