Hi Simon, Sure, we can have a look at the bugs existing in jira and try to take the “more important” one first. However be careful that the severity in JIRA may not reflect what we think. Any user having an issue that is blocking him/her will consider it critical even though it may be a special use case that we consider a not important at all compared to other more important bugs. Also note that 1-2 days to fix a bug is quite large and show allow to fix a big majority of them. Last point is that we’re not waiting for bug fix releases to fix important bugs, we do that every day already and that’s good. The point here is not just to do more of what we usually do, it’s also to do what we don’t do often (we do that once per week during BFDs only), i.e. fix easy bugs and also take the time to clean up our JIRA by closing bugs we won’t fix, that are duplicates, etc. Said differently closing 5 bugs that are marked ‘major’ can be a lot better for XWiki than fixing one hard bug marked critical but that’s specific to a seldom-used use case. I’d still like that we keep the spirit of trying to close the maximum number of bugs and stay within the 1-2 days if we can, as the general rule. Remember that the reason we’re doing these 2 BFD releases is to close more bugs than there are bugs created over the past 1600 days and go back to 0, which is the situation we were in, about 1-2 years ago. Thus we’ve lost ground and the goal is to catch up. Of course, if we notice an important bug, we can quickly discuss it between ourselves and decide if it’s really important and fix it. If you already have some ideas of such bugs, let’s discuss them. Thanks -Vincent