[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Start migrating our XE XAR to 2.0 syntax for 1.9 final
Hi, Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR. I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax. For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR. We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax. Here's my +1 Thanks -Vincent
+1 On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
+1 Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:45, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki Skype ID : wikibc http://guillaumelerouge.com/
+1, JV. On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
+1 for having a full 2.0 set of pages for 2.0M1 (or at least 2.0M2). +1 for having only 2.0 XARs. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
+1 Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
Following the mail vote for enabling the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final we need to decide on our strategy for the XE XAR.
I propose that we only support 1 XAR (since I don't think we have the manpower to support 2) and that this XAR is in 2.0 syntax.
For 1.9 we would only convert a few pages (listed in http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-3605) and in 2.0 we will continue till we have a full 2.0 syntax XAR.
We would also add a warning in the release notes for 1.9 listing the pages that have been converted to 2.0 syntax.
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
participants (8)
-
Guillaume Lerouge -
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Jerome Velociter -
lucien.pereira＠xwiki.com -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol