+1 On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, [email protected] < [email protected]> wrote:

+1

Thomas Mortagne wrote:

...

+1

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 13:43, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Hi,

I'd like to propose that we enable by default the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final (i.e do this in RC2).

Here's my +1

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

-- Guillaume Lerouge Product Manager - XWiki Skype ID : wikibc http://guillaumelerouge.com/

On May 19, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi,

I'd like to propose that we enable by default the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final (i.e do this in RC2).

Here's my +1

-0

Combining 1.0 and 2.0 content is not that tested, and making this change in a RC (the second) is not a good decision.

We could enable it now (first RC). -Vincent

Hi Ricardo, On May 20, 2009, at 1:40 PM, [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team wrote:

I have to update a 1.3.8295 to the current release. Is it advisable to take the risk of moving directly to 1.9 with 2.0 syntax enable or must I stick with 1.8.3 for such a transition?

2.0 syntax enabled = new pages are created with 2.0 syntax by default (unless you edit xwiki.properties and tell xwiki to use 1.0 by default). Existing pages in 1.0 syntax still work. Thus I don't see any risk. Thanks -Vincent

Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:

...

Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi,

I'd like to propose that we enable by default the 2.0 syntax in 1.9 final (i.e do this in RC2).

Here's my +1

-0

Combining 1.0 and 2.0 content is not that tested, and making this change in a RC (the second) is not a good decision.