Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r31913 - platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration
Hi Sergiu, On Oct 17, 2010, at 3:33 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu Date: 2010-10-17 03:33:22 +0200 (Sun, 17 Oct 2010) New Revision: 31913
Modified: platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml Log: [misc] New version number
Modified: platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml =================================================================== --- platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml 2010-10-17 01:10:40 UTC (rev 31912) +++ platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml 2010-10-17 01:33:22 UTC (rev 31913) @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ </parent> <artifactId>xwiki-application-administration</artifactId> <name>XWiki Platform - Applications - Administration</name> - <version>1.42-SNAPSHOT</version> + <version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
Why are we doing this? Did we agree about a strategy? I'm worried about aligning versions for all apps in case we decided something. Thanks -Vincent
<packaging>xar</packaging> <description>Application for administrating wiki features like users, groups, rights etc.</description> <!-- We must configure SCM in each module. For more information see:
On 10/17/2010 09:10 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi Sergiu,
On Oct 17, 2010, at 3:33 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu Date: 2010-10-17 03:33:22 +0200 (Sun, 17 Oct 2010) New Revision: 31913
Modified: platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml Log: [misc] New version number
Modified: platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml =================================================================== --- platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml 2010-10-17 01:10:40 UTC (rev 31912) +++ platform/xwiki-applications/trunk/administration/pom.xml 2010-10-17 01:33:22 UTC (rev 31913) @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ </parent> <artifactId>xwiki-application-administration</artifactId> <name>XWiki Platform - Applications - Administration</name> -<version>1.42-SNAPSHOT</version> +<version>2.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
Why are we doing this? Did we agree about a strategy? I'm worried about aligning versions for all apps in case we decided something.
My fault, I should have sent a proposal first. I was thinking that since we're moving applications to the 2.0 syntax, we could bump the version numbers to 2.x. Plus, the administration application will see a major rewrite, so changing the prefix would be nice.
Thanks -Vincent
<packaging>xar</packaging> <description>Application for administrating wiki features like users, groups, rights etc.</description> <!-- We must configure SCM in each module. For more information see:
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
participants (2)
-
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Vincent Massol