[xwiki-devs] [VOTE] Don't release 2.1M1 and instead replace 2.1M2 with 2.1M1
Hi, We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases. Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant a release IMO. I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept unchanged, see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap Here's my +1 Thanks -Vincent
+1 On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 18:22, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant a release IMO.
I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept unchanged, see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
+1, JV. On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant a release IMO.
I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept unchanged, see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
+1 Thanks, Marius Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant a release IMO.
I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept unchanged, see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Vote passed, I have changed the dates in jira. Thanks -Vincent On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
We were supposed to release 2.1M1 yesterday according to our initial roadmap. However we've all been working on 2.0.x releases and as a consequence there isn't much in 2.1M1 that isn't in 2.0.x releases.
Namely there are 11 issues and most of them are not very important (see http://tinycoke.com/_6rvPPs9pSbA/picture_1.png) and don't warrant a release IMO.
I'm proposing to remove 2.1M2 and extend 2.1M1 till 16 Nov (ie the date when 2.1M2 was supposed to be released). The other dates are kept unchanged, see http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Roadmap
Here's my +1
Thanks -Vincent
participants (4)
-
Jean-Vincent Drean -
Marius Dumitru Florea -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol