[xwiki-devs] [PROPOSAL] Choose a name for stable branches in git repositories
Hi devs, We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict with tags names. So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example: 1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT 2. stable-3.0 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one) WDYT ? +1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and easy to remember -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice -- Thomas Mortagne
On 04/29/2011 04:56 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT 2. stable-3.0 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and easy to remember -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
Same votes as you. As a minor alternative, "stable-3.0.x" (we could also change the naming strategy and release 3.1.0 instead of 3.1) FYI, Linux uses "linux-2.6.37.y". -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 18:03, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
On 04/29/2011 04:56 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT 2. stable-3.0 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and easy to remember -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
Same votes as you.
As a minor alternative, "stable-3.0.x" (we could also change the naming strategy and release 3.1.0 instead of 3.1)
FYI, Linux uses "linux-2.6.37.y".
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Lets assume no other answer mean +0, renaming to stable-3.0.x now -- Thomas Mortagne
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:56 +0200, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
My vote goes for 1/ (that would be the same as the artifact id for the branch snaps, right?) don't we need more of these, btw? for each repo? (platform and enterprise) or we can have same branch name on different repos? Thanks, Anca
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT 2. stable-3.0 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and easy to remember -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
On May 17, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Luca Anca wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 16:56 +0200, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
Hi devs,
We need to name stable branches in git repositories and we can't use the same name as in svn (xwiki-enterprise-3.0) since it will conflict with tags names.
So here are some proposals with xwiki-enterprise repository as example:
My vote goes for 1/ (that would be the same as the artifact id for the branch snaps, right?)
me too (at least until we get an agreement about our git dev process for branches). Thanks -Vincent
don't we need more of these, btw? for each repo? (platform and enterprise) or we can have same branch name on different repos?
Thanks, Anca
1. xwiki-enterprise-3.0-SNAPSHOT 2. stable-3.0 3. 3.0-SNAPSHOT 4. xwiki-3.0 (the current one)
WDYT ?
+1 for 2, that's what it is: stable branch 3.0 plus it's short and easy to remember -1 for 4, it does not make any sense to me 1 is probably what makes the most sense but it's a pain to write and would be nice to have the same thing in all repositories +0 for 3.0-SNAPSHOT, make sense but it's not very nice
participants (4)
-
Luca Anca -
Sergiu Dumitriu -
Thomas Mortagne -
Vincent Massol