XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi, Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day. I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling. Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind: 1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released. Thanks! -Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ D�couvrez une nouvelle fa�on d'obtenir des r�ponses � toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des exp�riences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/R�ponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Hi, I have 'unassigned' all my tasks and moved to 1.1 issues that are not bug. A lot of the issues need to be verified. I've put most of them in 1.0 (I know I shouldn't have). You should mass put them in B2 and RC1 but I'm afraid there are too many to be handled in B2/RC1 Ludovic Vincent Massol a écrit :
Hi,
Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day.
I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling.
Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind:
1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released.
Thanks! -Vincent
___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
-- Ludovic Dubost Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
-----Original Message----- From: Ludovic Dubost [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 22 décembre 2006 15:05 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi,
I have 'unassigned' all my tasks and moved to 1.1 issues that are not bug.
Yep, we've seen the flood... :-)
A lot of the issues need to be verified. I've put most of them in 1.0 (I know I shouldn't have).
This is fine. We'll move them to B2, RC1 or 1.1.
You should mass put them in B2 and RC1 but I'm afraid there are too many to be handled in B2/RC1
Yep Thanks -Vincent
Vincent Massol a écrit :
Hi,
Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day.
I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling.
Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind:
1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released.
Thanks! -Vincent
_____ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________ -
--
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki- [email protected] mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected] For general help: mailto:[email protected]?subject=help ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
-- Ludovic Dubost Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Hi everyone, I've checked JIRA and we need to make some decisions. 1) There are about 32 issues not assigned for B2 and RC1. These are issues that need to be fixed for 1.0 final. Thus I suggest that we do a Beta 3 before the RC1. The new dates would be: 1.0 Beta 2: 8 Jan 2007 1.0 Beta 3: 22 Jan 2007 1.0 RC1 : 5 Feb 2007 1.0 Final : 19 Feb 2007 If you're ok with this I'll do the following: a) Rename RC1 in Beta 3 b) Create a new RC1 version c) move all unassigned issues from beta 2 and beta 3 in RC1. 2) Please all review all the issues you can take and again please only take bugs to fix rather than improvements/new features, except for the Page Rename feature. 3) We need to know who's going to focus on what domain. I've identified the following domains: a) PDF bugs b) WYSIWYG editor bugs c) Page rename d) User interface bugs I think we can assign b) to Nam and d) to Sergiu and Marta. Now we need to allocate a) and c). I don't know who's worked on the PDF stuff before. Could committers come forward to take up a) and c)? 3) Sergiu and Marta, seeing the number of bugs we have I think you may need to focus a bit more on bugs rather than improvements/new features. IMO 1.0 is the same as 1.0 beta 1 but without the bugs. I think we should keep the improvements for 1.1. We could even release 1.1 close after 1.0 if we have important improvements to make. It would also be good to have our user's feedback to decide on our priorities and we need 1.0 out for this. Please let me all know your views. Thanks -Vincent, Release manager for 1.0
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 22 décembre 2006 14:44 To: [email protected] Subject: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi,
Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day.
I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling.
Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind:
1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released.
Thanks! -Vincent
_______________________________________________________________________ ____ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
One thing I forgot to mention is what I intend to work on: * Managing JIRA and the 1.0 release * Continue migrating the old.xwiki.org doc to the new xwiki.org site * Continue to understand the code * Continue on the m2 build and especially in the area of automated functional tests. Thanks -Vincent
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mardi 26 décembre 2006 10:39 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi everyone,
I've checked JIRA and we need to make some decisions.
1) There are about 32 issues not assigned for B2 and RC1. These are issues that need to be fixed for 1.0 final. Thus I suggest that we do a Beta 3 before the RC1. The new dates would be:
1.0 Beta 2: 8 Jan 2007 1.0 Beta 3: 22 Jan 2007 1.0 RC1 : 5 Feb 2007 1.0 Final : 19 Feb 2007
If you're ok with this I'll do the following: a) Rename RC1 in Beta 3 b) Create a new RC1 version c) move all unassigned issues from beta 2 and beta 3 in RC1.
2) Please all review all the issues you can take and again please only take bugs to fix rather than improvements/new features, except for the Page Rename feature.
3) We need to know who's going to focus on what domain. I've identified the following domains: a) PDF bugs b) WYSIWYG editor bugs c) Page rename d) User interface bugs
I think we can assign b) to Nam and d) to Sergiu and Marta. Now we need to allocate a) and c). I don't know who's worked on the PDF stuff before. Could committers come forward to take up a) and c)?
3) Sergiu and Marta, seeing the number of bugs we have I think you may need to focus a bit more on bugs rather than improvements/new features. IMO 1.0 is the same as 1.0 beta 1 but without the bugs. I think we should keep the improvements for 1.1. We could even release 1.1 close after 1.0 if we have important improvements to make. It would also be good to have our user's feedback to decide on our priorities and we need 1.0 out for this.
Please let me all know your views.
Thanks -Vincent, Release manager for 1.0
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 22 décembre 2006 14:44 To: [email protected] Subject: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi,
Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day.
I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling.
Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind:
1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released.
Thanks! -Vincent
______________________________________________________________________
_ ____ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________________________________ ____ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Hmm... Nobody seems to care... :-) I'll assume that's because everyone agrees. Thus I'll make the modifications accordingly in JIRA later today. Thanks -Vincent
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mardi 26 décembre 2006 10:39 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi everyone,
I've checked JIRA and we need to make some decisions.
1) There are about 32 issues not assigned for B2 and RC1. These are issues that need to be fixed for 1.0 final. Thus I suggest that we do a Beta 3 before the RC1. The new dates would be:
1.0 Beta 2: 8 Jan 2007 1.0 Beta 3: 22 Jan 2007 1.0 RC1 : 5 Feb 2007 1.0 Final : 19 Feb 2007
If you're ok with this I'll do the following: a) Rename RC1 in Beta 3 b) Create a new RC1 version c) move all unassigned issues from beta 2 and beta 3 in RC1.
2) Please all review all the issues you can take and again please only take bugs to fix rather than improvements/new features, except for the Page Rename feature.
3) We need to know who's going to focus on what domain. I've identified the following domains: a) PDF bugs b) WYSIWYG editor bugs c) Page rename d) User interface bugs
I think we can assign b) to Nam and d) to Sergiu and Marta. Now we need to allocate a) and c). I don't know who's worked on the PDF stuff before. Could committers come forward to take up a) and c)?
3) Sergiu and Marta, seeing the number of bugs we have I think you may need to focus a bit more on bugs rather than improvements/new features. IMO 1.0 is the same as 1.0 beta 1 but without the bugs. I think we should keep the improvements for 1.1. We could even release 1.1 close after 1.0 if we have important improvements to make. It would also be good to have our user's feedback to decide on our priorities and we need 1.0 out for this.
Please let me all know your views.
Thanks -Vincent, Release manager for 1.0
-----Original Message----- From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: vendredi 22 décembre 2006 14:44 To: [email protected] Subject: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 1.0 JIRA issues
Hi,
Reminder: We need everyone who are committing to implement issues for 1.0 B2 and RC1 to assign issues to themselves (or unassign themselves if they cannot do it). I'd like this to be finalized by today end of day.
I'll then do a full pass to see what's left and send a summary email. It's probably there'll be lots of important issues not taken up so we'll have to do some shuffling.
Make you select issues please choose with the following in mind:
1) no new features 2) as little as possible of improvements 3) bug fixes in priority 4) bug fixes raised in b1 in priority. There are several issues reported by users on the list which we need to transform into jira issues (the best is to ask users who are reporting them to do that in order to help) 5) Don't put any issues in 1.0. We should have issues only in B2 and RC1. We must leave 1.0 free for any bug found when RC1 is released.
Thanks! -Vincent
______________________________________________________________________
_ ____ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________________________________ ____ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
participants (2)
-
Ludovic Dubost -
Vincent Massol