don't like the dependency on google... be careful when XWIKI works in a closed network without connection to internet... but seems fine for quick access to JS libs :) regards Pascal On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:

On May 28, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Fabio Mancinelli wrote:

...

Hi all,

Maybe this can be interesting... http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/

Interesting. So basically google would act like a remote maven repository for ajax libraries, to be used at runtime.

* I like the fact that we don't have to host the source code in our source tree. * I like the fact that this allows controlling cleanly the versions of the library we use * I like a bit less the dependency on google.

Actually I'd prefer that we put the JS libraries we use in a remote maven repo and bind them at build time.

WDYT?

Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Pascal Voitot <[email protected]> wrote:

...

be careful when XWIKI works in a closed network without connection to internet...

+1, I haven't seen anything about this on the google ajax api website but I think a fallback on libs bundled with the application would be possible in that case though.

+1 I don't see the point of creating yet another dependency. I think we need to fix the way we server our libs to make sure we cache properly Ludovic -- Ludovic Dubost Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost