12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
4:43 p.m.
Hi
There was another discussion on this topic, where an effort has been made to
store the files directly on the filesystem. Not sure how this would reduce
memory consumption. Please read Sergiu's comments carefully though, before
you try this out.
Link
http://www.nabble.com/AttachmentStore---my-filesystem-based-implementation-…
here
Of course, in the meantime, we await the WebDAV implementation.
Shiva
vmassol wrote:
On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Artem Melentyev wrote:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XWiki-Does-Not-Handle-Attachments-Efficiently-tp17741…
Sent from the XWiki- Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, Vincent.
Vincent Massol wrote:
I see. So I guess the only solution would be drop JRCS and do our own
stuff... (or find another library that does it fast).
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Why is it using some much memory? Isn't that
a bug? (I don't
understand why we would need to load more than 1 attachment version
at
a time in memory).
Look at
http://xwiki.markmail.org/search/?q=attachments+storage+profiling#query
:attachments%20storage%20profiling+page:1+mid:5avjhiu2nkg4xtzt+state:results
Worse, if this is not the first version of the
attachment, then the
complete attachment history is loaded in memory, so add another
24*versionsize*versions of memory needed during upload.
This is a feature of JRCS :)