Hi Vincent, Of course, you MUST drop the IE6 support. +1 Maxime 2010/12/14 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>

Hi everyone,

As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?

The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.

Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

+1 as a user +100 as a developer ;) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vincent Massol Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:06 PM To: XWiki Users Subject: [xwiki-users] Dropping support for IE6? Hi everyone, As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you? The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff. Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft). Thanks -Vincent _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

As a user: +1 For my customers, some of whom are government agencies, IE 6 still seems to be relevant and they are often not in control of their own environment (e.g. can't install Firefox themselves for example, or IT dept won't let them.) bye, Menso On 14 dec 2010, at 11:06, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi everyone,

As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?

The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.

Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Met vriendelijke groet/With kind regards, Menso Heus Gendo B.V. Main: +31 20 891 0330 Cell: +31 639574833 [email protected] site: www.gendo.nl Gendo BV Wibautstraat 150, 1091 GR Amsterdam The Netherlands P please consider the environment before printing this email ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail message and its attachments are subject to the disclaimer published at the following website of Gendo: http://www.gendo.nl/disclaimer Gendo B.V. is registered with the trade register in The Netherlands under number 28116864.

+1 :-) Tim On 14 Dec 2010, at 10:06, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi everyone,

As users, I'm wondering what you'd think if we were to drop support for IE6 in the XWiki Enterprise 3.X cycle. Would that be a huge problem for you?

The reason I'm asking is because supporting IE6 costs us a lot in term of extra development time and by dropping it we could be faster on other stuff.

Note that this is just me asking, there's no plan about this at this point in time, I'm just curious to have some feedback, especially since support for IE6 has been dropped for lots of services and software out there (including Microsoft).

Thanks -Vincent

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Vincent, Thanks for replying. Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the content enclosed in <p/><p/> (I am running 2.6.33065) Regards, Tim On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi Tim,

try: xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain

Thanks -Vincent

On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:

...

I would like to return pure JSON from a page with a macro, to be called externally as a web service.

When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is still enclosed within <p> </p>.

Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?

Regards,

Tim

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 16:17, Tim Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

Vincent,

Thanks for replying.

Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the content enclosed in <p/><p/>

It's working very well for me as you can see in http://tuska.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Test/Plain?xpage=plain&outputSyntax=... The <p> is probably generated some way by your content or maybe you are using xwiki/1.0 syntax for which outputSyntax parameter is not supported.

(I am running 2.6.33065)

Regards,

Tim

On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi Tim,

try: xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain

Thanks -Vincent

On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:

...

I would like to return pure JSON from a page with a macro, to be called externally as a web service.

When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is still enclosed within <p> </p>.

Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?

Regards,

Tim

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Thomas Mortagne

Other way again will be to specify specify content type. Personally, with XE 2.6, I return an xml document with view action, xpage=plain and $response.setContentType('application/xml') Arnaud. 2010/12/15 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 16:17, Tim Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

...

Vincent,

Thanks for replying.

Using 'xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain', as you suggest, I still get the content enclosed in <p/><p/>

It's working very well for me as you can see in http://tuska.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Test/Plain?xpage=plain&outputSyntax=...

The <p> is probably generated some way by your content or maybe you are using xwiki/1.0 syntax for which outputSyntax parameter is not supported.

...

(I am running 2.6.33065)

Regards,

Tim

On 15 Dec 2010, at 13:01, Vincent Massol wrote:

...

Hi Tim,

try: xpage=plain&outputSyntax=plain

Thanks -Vincent

On Dec 15, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Tim Jones wrote:

...

I would like to return pure JSON from a page with a macro, to be called externally as a web service.

When I append xpage=plain to the URL of the page to omit the UI content, the output is still enclosed within <p> </p>.

Is there any way to get the plain text content without an enclosing paragraph tag?

Regards,

Tim

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users