I also have an issue with having different ways of doing the same thing. I think this is really bad for our users. For bold, I'd go for the *text* syntax (because that's the syntax I've seen used in most other wikis I've used) and deprecate the _text_ syntax. However I've not been here for long and I don't know the history around this so I'd rather defer to Ludovic or other old-timers to decide on this. Also, in order not to break any compatibility we need to continue to support the _text_ syntax. So I'd be to have both the xwiki editor and the WYSIWYG editor generate *text* syntax but they should continue to support the _text_ syntax. We'd also need to fix the XWiki syntax sheet to reflect this. Alternatively we should have the wiki editor and the WYSIWYG one transform the _text_ syntax into *text* syntax when the user saves a document. I'm interested in getting other's opinions. Thanks -Vincent
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: mercredi 27 décembre 2006 11:28 To: [email protected] Subject: [xwiki-dev] XWiki 309 : Bold codification is not the same than in wiki editor mode
Hi All ?
We will use syntax for bold text is *text* or _text_ for both editor mode ?
and how to config to show the toolbar in wiki editor (normal mode) .
In wysiwyg mode, bold text is coded with *text*. in wiki mode, when using the small toolbar, it is coded with _text_. In some cases, switching from wysiwyg to wiki mode, some problems appear, but I can't reproduce them systematically. I suggest to have a same codification between both modes to avoid any problem.
___________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface révolutionnaire. http://fr.mail.yahoo.com