Hi Vincent, On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:43 AM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 30, 2008, at 7:37 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
[snip]
I think we should start having our plugin app in Jira and have these as independent bug.. I let you handle this with Vincent.
A committer should first review the code, verify its production ready, that it follows xwiki best practices in term of coding standards, test frameworks used, etc. (as described on dev.xwiki.org).
At the same time we need to decide what structure the webdav feature will have. Is it only a xwiki plugin? Is it more?
It's another way of exposing an xwiki repository ...
My question was different... I'm talking in term of integration in the platform. Where should it go in the source tree? Again, is it only a plugin or more?
Well, if we consider xeclipse as a plugin, yes xwiki-webdav is also a plugin :) And i'm not clear what is meant by "More" ... hey, may be ludovic has a better idea ? :) Thanks. - Asiri
Does it need modification to the core/platform?
Nope. None!
This is my view of xwiki-webdav, we better ask someone other than myself to comment on this :)
Well you should know since you coded it... :)
Thanks -Vincent
Once we decide where it could go in the main svn we should start a vote to add it there.
From that point forward we can create related jira project, release a first version, add the pages on xwiki.org, etc.
Thanks -Vincent
Great! looking forward to it. I'll be so happy to move xwiki-webdav out of sandbox... :P
Thanks.
- Asiri
devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs