5 Nov
2008
5 Nov
'08
4:24 a.m.
asiri (SVN) wrote:
Author: asiri Date: 2008-11-04 11:31:26 +0100 (Tue, 04 Nov 2008) New Revision: 13949
+ private void filter(Node node) + { + if (node.hasAttributes()) { + try { + node.getAttributes().removeNamedItem("style"); + } catch (DOMException ex) { + // Not a problem. + } + }
I don't like this... try-catch code is costly, since creating an exception takes a lot of time and memory. Can't you check if the 'style' attribute exists instead? And a catch block in general should indicate an exceptional execution, not a normal, expected case. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/