Re: [xwiki-devs] [xwiki-notifications] r31053 - in platform/core/trunk/xwiki-rendering: xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/configuration xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/internal/configuration xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/internal/renderer/xhtml xwiki-rendering-api/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/wiki xwiki-rendering-xwiki xwiki-rendering-xwiki/src/main/java/org/xwiki/rendering/internal/configuration xwiki-rendering-xwiki/src/main/java/org/x

Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:

...

For ex, if I want the image to be displayed in the page but I also want to be able to give a URL to the full size image?

Currently I don't see this as a real use case. What do you want to achieve with this? How is the user interacting with the image?

As I said in a previous mail, resizing the image on the server is an optimization that needs to be transparent for the user. Do you think the user cares if the image is resized on the server or on the client if the result is almost the same?

A developer that wants to display the original image in a light box or in a different page can still use the $doc.getAttachmentURL to get the URL to the original, full size, image.

Thanks, Marius

...

Thanks -Vincent

Just to confirm that this is a real use case here: images are displayed in the page but at the same time are links to the original. We do need to provide users with this link as we never know what area of a given scientific picture could be of their interest. It will even better, on click, to get a selector allowing to choose the resolution at with the image want to be downloaded. I understand that $doc.getAttachmentURL allows to get the original, but for a regular user is much simpler to write {image:Figura_1.jpg| |200|link=} *1* (XWiki1.0 still here). Sorry if I've misunderstood the discussion! Thanks. Ricardo -- Ricardo Rodríguez CTO eBioTIC. Life Sciences, Data Modeling and Information Management Systems