If we were to export PDFs of documentation at a certain version than I would agree with this. Currently my feeling is that we are deleting information and not all our users are on LTS or recent versions. I agree is important to have the most simple and clear documentation, yet it's bad that we don't provide versioned documentation. Also, even cleaning now, it's a task that is very big and the info will get deprecated in a year. If the language we use is using present tense, users will still be confused 1 year later and still would not know about what version that documentation is talking about. Especially since there is no way we could validate documentation on year release. I don't have a clear solution for this problem. Thanks, Caty On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure, make sense.
I guess most document useless in >=LTS should be removed. Unless the documentation is designed to give the version information of for changelog stuff.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I think we need to start removing old mentions on xwiki.org. It makes it harder to read xwiki pages (as a user has just reported, see https://forum.xwiki.org/t/how-to-increase-active-installs- of-xwiki/3132/6?u=vmassol).
Also we said we don't support documenting old stuff (we only support doc for LTS, stable and latest).
For example I just did this: http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/ AdminGuide/Installation/InstallationConcludingSteps/? viewer=changes&rev1=11.2&rev2=11.3
Is that ok with everyone?
Thanks -Vincent
-- Thomas Mortagne