On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 15:15, Roman Muntyanu <[email protected]>wrote:
Hello Caty,
Hi Roman,
First a use-case of my first perception of the the page: 1) quick glance at the items in the left 2) distracted by the cube animation 3) try to click the cube thinking it does something 4) analyze what info is in the blogposts section 5) quick glance at Community hearbeat and powered by 6) scroll the page down and learn that there's nothing important for me there 7) scroll back to the top and study the connections 8) try to hovering the mouse on the cubes and watch them animate 9) (a lot later) notice that when I hover the mouse, description changes 10) (accidentally) click one of the buttons of the carousel and surprised by the animation 12) I thought that those screens were different options for new xwiki home page so I tried comparing them. Finally I understood that those are different info screens. 13) Compared design of cubes on page 1 and 3 (3 seemed better) 14) tried clicking on the cube with "+" on page 3 15) realized that I have a feeling of inconsistency with the colors 16) never noticed "All projects" on the first page 17) got frustrated how the animation starts for the cube on the page 1. Then understood that it starts when mouse enters the slide area. Noticed that cubes shiver like going to explode when reduce in size.
I really liked the way you presented your interaction with the proposal :)
I have following major comments * Fonts. Mix of different font types, different font sizes and all-capital vs camel words makes it hard to understand which info is important and which is not. * Size as relevance. Object sizes on the first page MUST hint the user what information he would rather look at next (e.g. http://www.ibm.com/us/en/, even http://www.jetbrains.com/youtrack/ ) . There's a misbalance in it. E.g. Platform, Enterprise, Manager, XEclipse and XOffice are the first candidates for the next browsing, but they are represented as tiny cubes, more over they are "pushed" out of sight into the left corner (1680x1050). * I literally look at 3 dots and the empty space around while focused at the center of my screen (1680x1050) * Animation. * Colors. I first got a feeling of deja vu about the cube colors. Then I remembered where I saw similar: http://www.xcomufo.com/ufo/battleship2.jpg http://push.cx/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/xcom.png
http://www.mobygames.com/images/shots/l/421342-x-com-ufo-defense-windows-scr...
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y143/Uberbucket/UFO%20Lets%20Play/62%20Cydo... http://www.linuxsoft.cz/screenshot_img/1349-a.jpg to name some ... I would agree that it brings extraterrestrial look, and would agree that you can combine all those colors (pink-purple, green, red, orange) in one page ( http://echostorms.net/Resources/Items/diablo%202%20gems%20and%20jewels.png) but I personally dislike mixes of some colors within one shape (I mean gradient in the cubes Violer-Puple-Red, Red-Orange-Yellow-Pink etc). And those colors do not match the header color. * Mix of styles. The cubes are in simplistic 2D style, while the menu bar has a Win-7-like bevel and glossiness.
I know I'm not in the position to make suggestions however ... * I like that your cubes if totally mapped to 2D turn into hexagons ( http://www.clker.com/clipart-3d-hexagon.html ) . It's pretty common to use cubes to show extensibility. But hexagons could be used for the same purpose ( http://www.mcfunkypants.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Catan.jpg) , leaving more place for styling: http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=55704010 http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=58237474
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-70819066/stock-vector-vector-illustration-of... can put logo of the component inside) * I like the concept of mapping Platform, Enterprise and Manager colors onto animated cube to show their places in the system. But I think that semi-transparent 2-d image on the back would better serve the purpose. The info could be displayed in the following way. E.g. Platform hexagon as the center, Enterprise, Manager, XEclipse, XOffice, More Projects hexagons around it, then a bit detached hexagon highlighting extensions (those that currently on the page 3 + "more" ). Then we can do the animation - highlight different groups of hexagons and display relevant info side to this "mind map". I can make a drawing later today if you're interested ...
Regarding the graphics: your suggestion were very interesting (with lots of examples :) ) and yes, we can try alternatives to better suggest the projects relation. I just did what it was on my mind. I really liked the http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=55704010 suggestion. Now that I learned to work with css animation and transitions it will be more easily to experiment. Anyway although there are lots of things that could be improved, I really think this version is better than what we currently have. Thank you Roman, Caty
Regards, Roman
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 23:03 PM To: XWiki Mailinglist Subject: [xwiki-devs] [Vote] New XWiki.org Homepage
Hi devs,
I've been working for a new XWiki.org homepage. You can find it live at http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XWikiOrgCode/WebHome
Static screenshots at: Slide1< http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgHomepag...
, Slide2< http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgHomepag... , Slide3< http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/XWikiOrgHomepag...
Any feedback regarding this work is welcomed.
I'm asking for your vote to make this proposal the default homepage for XWiki.org. This is my +1.
Thanks, Caty _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs