16 Dec
2008
16 Dec
'08
10:03 a.m.
On Dec 16, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Eduard Moraru wrote: [snip]
P.S.: From what I asked around, it seems that attachments are not objects. That seems weird to me because, intuitively, the attachments should be objects on a page of the class Attachment. On attachments you have versioning, meta-data and an attachment can exist on a page or not, the behaviour of an object. Could anybody explain the reason for this please?
I think I agree (need to think more of consequences). Probably historical reason. Attachments have a separate store but we could generalize this to let objects have an optional separate store too. Something to keep in mind when we redesign the model. Ludovic, any input from you on this? Thanks -Vincent