On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:01 PM, [Ricardo Rodriguez] Your EPEC Network ICT Team <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi!
Pascal Voitot wrote:
the wysiwyg should only be a helper allowing to access some features more easily but we need to keep the deep customization features (the XWiki wysiwyg editor is an example of that... you can write with it but when you need to have a more precise view, you go in the classical editor) I agree with that! But I think this was not true with the old XWiki wiki editor: switching between wiki and WYSIWYG editors results in losses and/or changes in the format and, as far as I can remember, even contents (changes in code that result in changes in displayed content). I guess this is not longer true with the new WYSIWYG included with 2.x. We are looking for enjoying it.
you're right, the new GWT editor is really greater than the previous editor! still some small bugs but really better!
for sure, this wouldn't be a problem ;)... Imagine you have a project with a quotation of 1.000.000 mendays... you find 1.000.000 people and in 1 day, you have your solution :)
Wait! We must change a concept here! We can not use man-day. We could use person-day or people-days! My wife is involved in genre equality policies and teaches me on this issues.
You would be right in a humanistic world but in ours, companies policies more and more teach me to speak about "cattle-days" :):)... and tell to your wife not to care about equality because women or men are quite equal with respect to this way of thinking: you're just a resource with a cost, nothing less, nothing more ;)
Greetings!
Ricardo
-- Ricardo RodrÃguez Your EPEC Network ICT Team
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs