Sounds better yes since it's actually a milestone and not a release candidate so make more sens to say that we do a final release without RC before than saying that this version which contain lots of new stuff that should never be in a RC is a RC. On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
We could also skip RC1 instead of skipping M1 and release M1 on 14th of Feb and go straight to final.
The pro is that we don't need to perform the rename in the source code.
-Vincent
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hi,
As usual (*sigh*, we need to fix that!) we've lagged in the release of XE 3.5M1 and we need to define what are the new dates.
Since we want 3.5 to be a short release I propose to do the following:
* Skip 3.5M1 and instead go straight to 3.5RC1 * Release 3.5RC1 on Tuesday 14th (Marius who's the RM isn't available on the 13th). This means we need to start stabilizing **NOW** and fix all failing tests in order to be ready Tuesday morning. * Call 3.5RC1 the Love Release ;) since it's on Valentine's day… * Keep the 3.5 final date for the 20th of February
* Rename all @since in code and documentation from 3.5M1 to 3.5RC1
-Vincent
WDYT?
Thanks -Vincent
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne