On 31 Jul 2014 at 14:08:08, Thomas Mortagne ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:
On 29 Jul 2014 at 19:34:50, Sergiu Dumitriu ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
+1 from me.
It is still being used as the WYSIWYG editor of documents in the xwiki/1.0 syntax, also as the WYSIWYG editor used for textarea fields displayed by a sheet for 1.0 documents. That could mean a lot of content created by old applications, and a lot of long-lived wikis migrated from 1.x XWiki instances. Do we want to keep the buggy WYSIWYG editor for those, or do we want to give them another push to migrate the documents as well?
Good point, I had forgotten it’s still used by xwiki/1.0 syntax.
BTW, even though we don’t have docs in xwiki/1.0 syntax anymore in XE we still have some in platform: - xwiki-platform-application-manager-ui
- xwiki-platform-repository-server-ui
No this application is not using xwiki/1.0 syntax, it just contain an application manager descriptor.
There’s one doc with xwiki/1.0 syntax: <xwikidoc> <web>ExtensionCode</web> <name>XWikiApplicationExtensionRepository</name> <language/> <defaultLanguage/> <translation>0</translation> <parent>XAppManager.WebHome</parent> <creator>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</creator> <author>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</author> <customClass/> <contentAuthor>xwiki:XWiki.Admin</contentAuthor> <creationDate>1304955109000</creationDate> <date>1322142794000</date> <contentUpdateDate>1322142794000</contentUpdateDate> <version>1.1</version> <title/> <template/> <defaultTemplate/> <validationScript/> <comment/> <minorEdit>false</minorEdit> <syntaxId>xwiki/1.0</syntaxId> Thanks -Vincent
I’m still +1 to remove TinyMCE and add explanations on how to add it to your instance if you need it.
What do others think?
Thanks -Vincent
On 07/29/2014 07:25 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi devs,
Here’s what I commented on https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/307 :
“ Thanks Pascal. I've just noticed that we still bundle TinyMCE in XWiki's WAR. It was probably left for backward compatibility but since it's been like 6-7 years that we've dropped it, I believe we could vote about dropping it from our sources and if someone really needs it they'll still be able to manually install them in their wikis. I'll follow up on the devs list, thanks. “
WDYT? Are you ok to remove it?
Thanks -Vincent