On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 16:35, Fabio Mancinelli <[email protected]> wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 15:38, Jean-Vincent Drean <[email protected]> wrote:
-0 for a parameter for the same reasons as Thomas. +1 for a new action (/plain/ for example). IMHO If we discover a
Not sure about "plain" since the main use case that raised this issue was about the comments content which is html. Unless you don't mean "plain" as "plain/1.0" renderer syntax but i think we should use something because it does not reflect the fact it's an kind of sub/minor query.
Here is a list coming form the previous mails and some more i can think of (feel free to add others): * plain: -1 * viewinternal: +0 * internal: -1 (not related enough to view) * service: -1 (there is no reason a service would not log the result in stats) * minorview: +0.5 * subview: +0.5
What about a simple "get"?
+1 for get
If you want to retrieve a resource for the sake of having it as a part of a bigger request you can use a non-semantically-bound and generic action. This could work for every resource: comments, images, attachments, etc.
If, on the other hand, you want some additional behavior associated to a specific semantics of the action (e.g., logging or increasing the pageviews when it's actually a view) you use a more specific action like "view", "download", etc. (like it's done right now)
-Fabio _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne