On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Gary Kopp <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas,
On a minor note, I guess I could "solve" the aspect plugin problem by falling back to Indigo. And perhaps solve the other two problems by not importing the two projects that are involved -- xwiki-commons-component-legacy-default and xwiki-commons-tool-license-resources, although this might result in a non-buildable project tree in Eclipse anyway.
On a more significant note, what I intended to do may be infeasible. And possibly never attempted. My goal is to study virtually every part of the code base. With Eclipse I could easily follow class and method references in as much depth as I wanted. And I could theoretically use container-based debugging to trace execution flow through the entire application. But all of that requires that I have the entire code base in one Eclipse workspace, and that's what I was starting out to build. Would that be hopeless/fruitless? I do have alternatives to Eclipse for at least part of my goal, but not for real-time debugging.
You should not really expect to completely replace maven with m2e from my point of view, this is just useless. If you don't import some project m2e will trigger it from the maven repository as dependency which is why importing only what you are working on is useful, it's not everything or nothing. m2e give dynamic dependencies resolution, better integration with various Eclipse plugins and be able to run and debug stuff which is already great, if you need to actually build some jar you will never find easier than actually execute "mvn install" in a shell.
--Gary
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Mortagne Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 3:25 AM To: XWiki Developers Subject: Re: [xwiki-devs] m2eclipse and xwiki-commons
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Gary Kopp <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello devs,
I just finished porting my XWiki development environment from Windows 7 to Ubuntu 12.04. I am now able to build all projects from the command line without errors. I'm working with the master branch from Git. I have Eclipse Juno installed with plugins that include m2eclipse (the version from the Eclipse update site) and AJDT. I am now trying to import the entire xwiki-commons Maven project into Eclipse. Just as happened under Windows (which I never asked about, since I was still trying to get command line builds to work), there are three Maven goals (plugins) in the xwiki-commons projects that fail to map to Eclipse plugins -- aspectJ-maven-plugin, maven-antrun-plugin, and maven-remote-resources-plugin. Can anyone give me some hints on how to resolve these mapping problems? Googling for answers about this hasn't yielded anything that I can understand :-)
I usually only open what I'm working on in Eclipse because otherwise with commons/rendering/platform it's a lot of projects and it's slowing down everything for things you probably don't care.
As for the missing mapping between Maven plugins and m2e handlers: * aspectJ-maven-plugin: could not find any either, there used to be one but it does not work anymore on 4.x. There is no official version of AJDT for 4.x so that's probably why it's not yet fixed but it
Actually there is one now since 4.2 (there was not not very long ago) so I guess (hope) the handler is probably going to be fixed in not too long.
should be quickly fixed as soon as there is an official AJDT for 4.x. In that case it's not very hard to setup AJDT yourself properly for the project, basically it's just about enabling it for the project and adding the right folder in the list of source folders if I remember well. But aspectj is used only in some legacy projects to produce retro-compatibility APIs so you are probably not going to need it very often. * maven-antrun-plugin: used for a hack in one of the legacy projects so for now it should not be a big deal for you * maven-remote-resources-plugin: not sure why you have issue with this one, m2e ignore it by default and just indicate it in a warning
--Gary
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne