Votes so far on layout: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent) 3. +1 (GL) After more discussions the vote swifted towards: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb), +0 (Marius), +0 (Vincent) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent) 3. +1 (GL) My preference goes to 2. I vote for 2 since I believe that the Tree is already in the Breadcrumb, and the breadcrumb is introduced by the Tour. I vote for 2 since we have scalability issues that I believe they will pose some problems on the long run for the users. The only advantage var 1 has is that it displays the tree from the start to the user. But after a time the user will be 'forced' to configure its wiki and remove it. Each time the user will install a new app, both the Appbar and the Tree will increase in size. I like much more the classic AppBar navigation pattern and I think XWiki's greater strength is in applications. We are lacking now multiple flavors that could showcase both the KB and Groupware cases, but if I were to choose a default, that would be Groupware. So on V1 I will be +0, but definitely -1 on V3. Votes so far: 1. +1 (Ludovic), +1 (Caleb), +0 (Marius), +0 (Vincent), +0 (Caty) 2. +1 (GD), +1 (Marius), +1 (Vincent), +1 (Caty) 3. +1 (GL), -1 (Caty) Thanks, Caty On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote:
I disagree with this point, as a user of web interfaces I don't care if they look completely busted as long as I can make use of them, even if they become unusable in 5% of the situations, that's 95% where I can use them.
Granted if we ship something that looks broken it's an embarassement but if we ship something that a person cannot navigate then we don't even have them complaining at us, they just become another silent non-adopter.
On 08/06/16 11:01, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote:
So I think version (1) looks good but it doesn't scale with what we have right now. Thus I'm more in favour of solution (2), at least until we can resize the panel width.
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs