+1 On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 15:58, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1 provided that it's shown in the syntax display name that this is still in an experimental state.
It's already displayed like this thomas.
Thanks -Vincent
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by
default for 2.6RC1.
Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0.
The rationale is: * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to
provide feedback
Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it
should be enough to let people know about its status.
Here's my +1
WDYT?
Thanks -Vincent
devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs