On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:07 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected] > wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:57 PM, Lucien PEREIRA wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Working on annotation feature, I need to retrieve >> xwiki document source code from a selection on XHTML. >> >> This requires to have a correspondence between content >> typed by user and content that appears in html. >> >> I noticed in xwiki 2.0 synthax that white spaces typed >> in a list item context are ignored : >> >> *< >> space >>> >> < >> space >>> < >>> space >>>> < >>>> space><space>foo<space><space><space>bar<space><space><space> >> >> renders in XHTML >> >> <li>foo<space> bar </li> >> >> so I could not determine the real offset of selection in xwiki >> document source. > > There's another problem: leading spaces before list items and > headers. > We need to allow them (for several reasons, one of them is for > supporting indenting velocity code when we have velocity mixed > with > wiki syntax). So in term of rendering they should be considered > as a > ListItemBlock and the spaces should not be rendered. > > One problem is when we go through the wysiwyg these spaces > will be > removed. Removing them for content not in macros is not such a > big > deal IMO (except for Lucien's use case but there are other > ways of > doing it for him). Removing them would be a problem when inside > macros. Fortunately we don't touch at macro content for the > moment. > >> This can be solved by not ignoring spaces so render become : >> >> < >> li >>> >> >> ; >> ; >> ; foo<space> bar </ >> li> >> >> This policy of rendering already exists in underline or italic >> context so it's strange to have a different behaviour in list >> item context. >> >> Moreover I think we should not suppose what content is >> relevant for user or not, so source shouldn't be altered. > > We have to alter source in the case of badly formed content, > as in > "**bold". We also later for unisignificant escapes (as with > "~hello"' > is transformed into "hello") + some other use cases probably. > > Right now I don't have any idea of what to do differently. Only > idea I > could think of would be to have a parameter for list items and > headers, passing to them the number of leading spaces, tabs, etc > but I > don't like this too much. > > I think the idea of leaving the content intact is not correct > and > we > shouldn't expect that behavior for a wiki syntax. A wiki syntax > needs > to be as simple as possible for users to use. Allowing leading > spaces > go in that direction. OTOH I agree with Lucien that we've > decided > to > make spaces in paragraph significant so it's not fully > consistent. > > What do others think?
I agree that it's not alway possible to respect the original source especially with useless escapes (~toto which become toto).
Now in the case of list item content I think we should support it because it's exactly the same context that space in a paragraph and such so it have to behave the same way for consistency.
So +1 to support spaces at beginning of list item.
Could you explain what you mean by "support spaces at begining of list item"?
Yes it's not very clear: +1 for not removing first spaces of list item content. In other words +1 for changing the current behavior.
This is still not clear.
If we don't remove leading spaces is it still a list item?
And if it's still a list item how do we implement this since lists are block elements?
And what about spaces after the first space after the list item delimiters?
+1 for :
<#LI: (<SPACE>)* ( ("*")+ (":" | ";")* | ( "1" | "*" )+ "." (":" | ";")* | (":" | ";")+ ) (<SPACE>)* >
I mean <#LI: (<SPACE>)* ( ("*")+ (":" | ";")* | ( "1" | "*" )+ "." (":" | ";")* | (":" | ";")+ ) (<SPACE>) >
ok, I'd agree with this one. It makes sense to me too. Note for others: it still means that entering: (space)(space)*(space)item is transformed into: *(space)item for example when going from wysiwyg editor to wiki syntax. Thanks -Vincent
in place of
<#LI: (<SPACE>)* ( ("*")+ (":" | ";")* | ( "1" | "*" )+ "." (":" | ";")* | (":" | ";")+ ) (<SPACE>)+ >
Thanks -Vincent