On 04/13/2010 11:29 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost<[email protected]> wrote:
+1 for 4A
and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing arm.. I can't read XWiki in it..
I'd like to react about this: at this stage I share Ludovic's feeling. I had people from outside the project look at the 16 logo and they weren't able to read "XWiki" in it. I'm afraid that while stylistically interesting, this logo is too unreadable for mainstream use - unless we don't expect anyone to understand the XWiki logo that is.
I'm feeling pretty close to giving it a -1 too if its readability isn't improved. I know I might be going against the flow here but we're about to make a significant choice here and I don't want us to regret it.
Any thoughts?
Maybe it would be good for people to propose improved versions, but it will be hard to improve readability while also maintaining the style/logo idea. One option would be to keep just the X from the logo, and use a normal font for writing the actual product name (something like 4 does with the pencils).
Guillaume
Ludovic
Le 12/04/10 16:44, Sergiu Dumitriu a écrit :
On 04/12/2010 04:30 PM, Thibaut Camberlin wrote:
My corrected vote is +1 for 12A.
12A has been retired and is no longer a valid option. Please choose another one.
-- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/