[snap]
4) Tables: do we keep the table macro or do we want a wiki syntax for tables.
Also need more input.
My take is that we should go with a macro since this allows us to have more options like filterable/sortable/pageable/etc than a wiki syntax.
I'm also in favor of keeping a macro for tables. It's less elegant than a wiki syntax such as Confluence's : Header || Header || Header Item | Item | Item but it provides for more flexibility, and being able to add the parameters to turn a classic table into a sortable / filterable one would be good. I have a couple questions about this though : using a wiki macro, how could one specify which headers should be filtered and which ones shouldn't for instance ? In HTML code those settings are set at the <th> level, but in a XWiki macro parameters have to be passed between { & } if I understand well... What's the solution to this ? Guillaume