Gnu lists CC-BY and CC-BY-SA as GPL incompatible http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OtherLicenses In my opinion, licensing something under multiple licenses which are as incompatible is not the best decision, the obvious problem is it is not allowable to distribute the WAR with the XAR preinstalled. There may be a problem with the viral nature of LGPL given that the core (templates) make reference to XE (download the default pages here) and XE obviously makes a lot of calls to core functions. Since each references the other it might be hard to claim that XE is using the core is as a library. I think that we need to define what activity we want to allow and what we want to prevent. Caleb Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 02/02/2010 06:27 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Hi devs,
I just noticed that although we've been saying that "This wiki is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 license", all the source files for the wiki pages are actually under the LGPL, which contradicts the wiki. Actually our pages are under no license right now (There's no license in the XML files and there should be one).
Kind of, the license is in the pom. Although it does not appear in each file, doesn't the fact that it's a file belonging to a LGPL project almost make it LGPL too?