20 Jan
2010
20 Jan
'10
4:11 p.m.
On 01/20/2010 04:17 PM, Anca Luca wrote:
Hi Sergiu,
On 01/20/2010 05:14 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 01/19/2010 05:35 PM, Anca Luca wrote:
Hi devs,
Short story:
In the new model, does it make sense to support entities that don't have an unique name to be identified in their 'context'? (so-called 'free name', as in free thought).
+1
+1 is for enforcing entities to have free names? (i.e. adding names to objects in the future) or for refactoring to support entities that don't have free names?
+1 for free names everywhere. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/