which option are you +1 for? "none of the above" isn't really an option unless you have a plan. Caleb On 04/28/2011 10:37 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 16:36, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> wrote:
-0
(was -0 for 1)
pretty much the same comments as Vincent. Without talking about false positive there is real bug here and since there is tests to catch them people should look at them sometimes...
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 15:40, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote:
I offered to take over the release since Jerome was unable to do it and right now we have 38 test failures. 16 selenium1 tests, 6 selenium2/ui-tests 16 webstandards tests.
We have 3 options: 1. We can release now and accept bugs in the release. 2. We can have volunteers to take over tests and get them passing for tomorrow so tomorrow I can release. 3. We can opt to postpone the release. If I work on these alone I expect it to take about 1 week as long as nobody commits code which introduces further regressions.
I don't think postponing the release is wise at this point and #2 is contingent upon volunteers claiming ownership of specific tests so I think #1 is the lesser of the evils.
Do I hear any objections/volunteers?
Caleb
_______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne